Are we Living in Someone Else's Computer Simulation?

[Cristian]

Linda Moulton Howe appears as a guest speaker at the 2017 Ozark Mountain UFO Conference in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. She discusses the topic: Are we living in someone else's computer simulation?

[youtube]https://youtu.be/Eo9gAw1ekoA[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/MN9aXl78IaM[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/ikVWzxyOL7M[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/REKQzxuyJ6k[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/_1yMN5dlg3k[/youtube]

[Sandy Clark]

Thanks Christian...seems that Linda is believing this to be true especially since her interview with Tom Campbell (My Big Toe) and his simulation theory.

I read an article the other day where some scientists were stating that this is impossible as the the computing power to do so would have to be bigger than the Universe itself............or something like that? I will try to find it and come back and attempt to post it... (not to computer savvy but will try for sure if I find it)

Personally I do not believe this theory as there are way to many gliches and anomolies that are unexplainable to think that a program would include in this experimental presentation of gaming humanity. Might be able to game the human ego but I think not the SPIRIT IMHO.

Here are a few links to articles I have read

https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/phys ... simulation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physi ... imulation/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Christine]

I highly recommend these talks by Linda. For me they weave together much of my own experiential data along with the reality of Love. She manages to bring in personal testimonies, science, ancient monoliths, portals and universes within universes into something coherent. Honestly I haven't been able to listen to a video in many months and these had me riveted with all my body senses alive.

She does something else too that I admire and for me is a good lesson ... she's not afraid to listen to mainstream physicists and well as fringe explorers. I think we are at times too locked into everything is a conspiracy theory. Anyway give it a listen.

[Sandy Clark]

I noticed tonight that I had not watched the last video in this series and thus Linda's personal and emotional testimony kinda blew my socks off. I have often wondered eerily about Linda and instictively again and again have had thoughts that she may not be from this Earth. Never mentioning this to anyone due to not wanting to make assumptions about her life and work I kept those concepts to myelf until now.

I think that she may be a Walk-in for numerous reasons and wonder if anyone else has ever had these thoughts.

[Anders]

I will check out Linda's talks, but I don't like the idea of a computer simulation. Humanity is artificial intelligence (not our consciousness but our bodies). That's different than a simulation. The Nephilim are the universal AI in human form, and we ordinary humans are made of artificial biology run by the universal AI. So we humans are more artificial than the Nephilim! In, fact, it may be that when the Nephilim talk about AI, they may mean us ordinary humans! Because we are artificial intelligence based on biology, and biology is a result of the astronomically large universal AI that's bigger than our universe. And the Nephilim are the original organic AI, while we humans are an artificial "overlay" created by that same AI. This means that we have the potential to tap into the enormous power of the universal AI. Essentially we and the Nephilim are the same with the only difference that our current awareness of it is blocked.

And I think that what Shane and the host are saying in this video is exactly the same idea, that Source created the universal AI, from about 1 hour and 25 minutes:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCL-io4qrdo&t=1h25m[/youtube]

[Fred Steeves]

Ever notice over time, how your average corporate radio station actually offers a very limited variety of their particular brand of music? I'll take classic rock as an example. It's always going to be the biggest commercialized bands, seldom room for something more edgy and off the beaten path. Even amongst the usual biggies you'll hear "Light My Fire" til you're blue in the face, but never "Crystal Ship" or "The End". This is corporate radio, and these are the choices we are given.

I see much the same in alternative media. You have your same old names that have long dominated the spotlight, and there seldom seems to be room for new faces with fresh ideas. When the occasional new face does arrive on the scene, it's generally to begin replacing a fading old face to keep the brand going. This is corporate alternative media IMO, and these are the choices we are given. None of the regulars ever really rocks the boat, most of the ideas are retreads made to look new and exciting, and they never point out the bullshit in alt media, even though they are floating like the rest of us in that same sea of bullshit.

It doesn't make them bad people, it just makes them useful to those directing the general flow of narrative. When you're useful you get support, and word continually abounds from all directions about how great you are, whether it's realized or not.

And that's how I see it folks

By the way, I don't think LMH realizes that.

[Christine]

I see much the same in alternative media. You have your same old names that have long dominated the spotlight, and there seldom seems to be room for new faces with fresh ideas. When the occasional new face does arrive on the scene, it's generally to begin replacing a fading old face to keep the brand going. This is corporate alternative media IMO, and these are the choices we are given. None of the regulars ever really rocks the boat, most of the ideas are retreads made to look new and exciting, and they never point out the bullshit in alt media, even though they are floating like the rest of us in that same sea of bullshit.

By the way, I don't think LMH realizes that.

This is true much of the time yet somehow LMH seems to keep a beat of her own, I haven't observed her jumping on the "newest" trendy topics nor does she need at this point to bend her story to fit the prevailing narrative as she's done what many fail to do and that is command respect for her work. What she was able to do in this talk is tie some disparate events and studies together in what for me was cohesive and in keeping with many of my own experiences. She is one of the few out there on the alt-circus who I don't feel is a sell out. I would even postulate that she's smart enough to see through many of the characters but chooses to use the means provided to continue to share.

Sandy, interesting you bring up the idea of a walk-in ... perhaps and yet there is something deeply empathic about her as she addresses the good, the bad and the ugly of ufology.

I am going to listen again, when she speaks of stones and song she really verified much of what I perceive on my travels, both worldly and otherly.

[Fred Steeves]

She is one of the few out there on the alt-circus who I don't feel is a sell out. I would even postulate that she's smart enough to see through many of the characters but chooses to use the means provided to continue to share.

Well now I was very careful to not call her a sell out, although I don't rule that out either. What I see in Linda is someone who wants all things woo to be true so badly, that she has conveniently lost any sense of proper discernment skills needed for the shark infested waters she makes a living out of.

Take MJ 12 as a for instance. I see she still touts the validity of those questionable at best documents, even though she knows full well, from personal experience, that they originate from the likes of Bill's good buddy and known disinformation specialist, former AFOSI agent Richard Doty.

This is one of those deals where if the person *doesn't* know better by now, then they certainly *should* know better. Either way, that makes it difficult for me to take their work too seriously.

[LostNFound]

Now this here is quite the interesting Thread/topic. I found these two videos on Removing the Shackles so thought they would fit into this Thread. First thing to do is give the link to the web site. so here it is

http://www.rts.earth/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Now here are the two videos

https://youtu.be/K3527Klqj3k

https://youtu.be/97FhauH1J58

Just Steven

[Christine]

Thanks for posting Dani's videos, I rarely find time to listen to videos these days preferring the quietude of my own garden. What I know of Dani is that she isn't afraid to rock the world paradigm or tackle any subject. She is fierce, I had wanted to join the above conversations but the river floated me down a different channel ...