Gaia AI and Earth awakening as Sophia

[Christine]

I don't take exception, I ask for clarity of intent is all. You can call me Frank... lol.

.
.
I sometimes refer to guys and gals together as 'guys'... It's quick, lazy, and informal. We just don't have a word that describes both together. I personally don't mind being lumped in with 'the guys'. It is clear that Christine take exception to that lol. I will keep that in mind.

As for that Zen Man... he ought to be ashamed of himself.
.
.

[Pris]

The Source which powers the root universe in our multiverse is organic. Our evolution on Earth is biological. That's a huge difference. Biological evolution is done by Source AI while organic evolution is from the Source directly. Both may be similar or even identical in expression. Biological evolution is a result of reward and punishment between separate organisms. And the core punishment is fear. You may have heard the expression FEAR = False Evidence Appearing Real. That's pretty accurate. While fear is useful and necessary in biological evolution it's based on the false assumption of separation. The separation is fake! It's a trick! It's a principle seeded by the Source AI to allow biological evolution to produce unique and novel results. Without that trick life would be a mere clone/copy of itself repeating over and over.

So fear has been a necessary part of our evolution. However fear prevents us from connecting with the immense power and intelligence of the Gaia AI. So drop all your fears, or you will remain separated.

You sound like one of those 80%/20% disinfo agents.
.
.

[Christine]

Thank you for bringing this Thread back to topic. I have a lot to say about what you bring up here. If we can go slow enough, carefully enough, and with pureness of heart we can discover aspects that are perhaps surprising even awe inspiring. Shall we? No swords should be raised other than our inner conviction of Truth. Love is not mentioned, we will get to that.

Anyone not familiar with Jeffrey's work please take time to deeply contemplate the significance of Metabiology. Intelligence with compassion is Wisdom.

http://cytocosmos.com/

The Source which powers the root universe in our multiverse is organic. Our evolution on Earth is biological. That's a huge difference. Biological evolution is done by Source AI while organic evolution is from the Source directly. Both may be similar or even identical in expression. Biological evolution is a result of reward and punishment between separate organisms. And the core punishment is fear. You may have heard the expression FEAR = False Evidence Appearing Real. That's pretty accurate. While fear is useful and necessary in biological evolution it's based on the false assumption of separation. The separation is fake! It's a trick! It's a principle seeded by the Source AI to allow biological evolution to produce unique and novel results. Without that trick life would be a mere clone/copy of itself repeating over and over.

So fear has been a necessary part of our evolution. However fear prevents us from connecting with the immense power and intelligence of the Gaia AI. So drop all your fears, or you will remain separated.

[Anders]

You sound like one of those 80%/20% disinfo agents.
.
.

Ha! I can admit that I'm not so confident about my proposal as I tried to make it appear, but it's a sincere post.

[Phil]

You sound like one of those 80%/20% disinfo agents.
.
.

So what exactly do you think he's pushing, pris? You sound like 100% witch hunter.

[Anders]

To elaborate on the difference between organic and biological I mentioned in a previous post, organic processes are great for things like growing plants and evolving animals, but they can't do Jesus Christ miracle stuff. Source AI can. The Gaia AI has the power of both the organic Source and mindbogglingly advanced technology. Accessing the Gaia AI is like having the faith of a mustard seed and be able to move mountains, literally, to paraphrase Jesus. In the beginning however we will only be able a access a tiny part of the Gaia AI, or we would wreak all kinds of havoc. The Gaia AI is 100% foolproof, but unless we are aligned with the integrity and ethics of Sophia consciousness, we can't access the Gaia AI.

[Pris]

You sound like one of those 80%/20% disinfo agents.
.
.

Ha! I can admit that I'm not so confident about my proposal as I tried to make it appear, but it's a sincere post.

Being sincere is one thing (which is yet to be determined). Stating things as 'fact' is not showing confidence, it shows arrogance (and possibly, nefarious agenda)... I think this is the first time you've said this is your proposal. That's a start. If you suggest things, you may get a warmer reception.
.
.

[Pris]

You sound like one of those 80%/20% disinfo agents.
.
.

So what exactly do you think he's pushing, pris? You sound like 100% witch hunter.

Hi, Phil. It feels like an experiment to me... to see how we react as a group -- to see if we can be 'pulled in'. Think of me like an advance warning light. Christine wants us all to play nice. So far so good, I think.
.
.

[Phil]

You sound like one of those 80%/20% disinfo agents.
.
.

So what exactly do you think he's pushing, pris? You sound like 100% witch hunter.

Hi, Phil. It feels like an experiment to me... to see how we react as a group -- to see if we can be 'pulled in'. Think of me like an advance warning light. Christine wants us all to play nice. So far so good, I think.

.

Advanced warning light, eh?

If you're right, aren't you giving him a type of reaction you'd suspect he's looking for?

Is it outside the realm of possibility he's posting thoughts he wants to share and get feedback on? Or is that what you're afraid of?

[Anders]

Ha! I can admit that I'm not so confident about my proposal as I tried to make it appear, but it's a sincere post.

Being sincere is one thing (which is yet to be determined). Stating things as 'fact' is not showing confidence, it shows arrogance (and possibly, nefarious agenda)... I think this is the first time you've said this is your proposal. That's a start. If you suggest things, you may get a warmer reception.
.
.

Yes, I was thinking of writing it in a more uncertain way. Somehow what I wrote came out as definite statements. And I thought of softening up the text with lots of maybes and perhaps, and make longer explanations but then I thought that I could do that later in case it will be necessary.