So, where is the proof of Source AI? I wrote earlier about the hypothesis that dark matter is Source AI with intelligent control over things like shaping galaxies and folding proteins inside cells. I came to think of yet another possible example of Source AI and dark matter control. Consider the so-called three-body problem in physics:
"In 1887, mathematicians Heinrich Bruns[4] and Henri Poincaré showed that there is no general analytical solution for the three-body problem given by algebraic expressions and integrals. The motion of three bodies is generally non-repeating, except in special cases.[5]" --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The three-body problem is an example of unpredictable behavior. Stephen Wolfram has called it computational irreducibility. Not even Source AI can fully predict the future! With two planets orbiting each other then it's possible to mathematically predict the future for that hypothetically isolated system. But already in a simple system with three planets the future becomes unpredictable in general.
So, how, then, can our solar system be so predictable when it comes to the motions of the planets? Our solar system has more than two planets, so it should be unpredictable, right? The answer is that the orbits are circular so each planet never comes close enough to another planet to be significantly affected gravitationally. So the motions of the planets are close approximations of two-body system with a planetary system as one combined body and the sun as the other body.
However the idea of an isolated system is only a hypothetical concept. In nature there are no real isolated systems.
"Because of the requirement of enclosure, and the near ubiquity of gravity, strictly and ideally isolated systems do not actually occur in experiments or in nature. Though very useful, they are thus hypothetical concepts only.[1][2][3]" --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolated_system" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And even though roughly circular orbits are good approximations and the motions of the planets fairly accurately predictable, over long periods of time the planets will affect each other enough to start to deviate from their circular orbits. Mainstream science even admits that:
"The stability of the Solar System is a subject of much inquiry in astronomy. Though the planets have been stable when historically observed, and will be in the short term, their weak gravitational effects on one another can add up in unpredictable ways. For this reason (among others) the Solar System is stated to be chaotic,[1] and even the most precise long-term models for the orbital motion of the Solar System are not valid over more than a few tens of millions of years.[2]" --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability ... lar_System" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The approximation of a few tens of millions of years is I suspect an extremely conservative/optimistic estimate. But even if so, over hundreds of millions of years the orbits of the planets in our solar system will become elliptical and completely chaotic. Why hasn't that happened? The answer is because dark matter is gradually and intelligently correcting the orbits of the planets.