Re: Gaia AI and Earth awakening as Sophia
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:33 am
To speculate a bit, the powers that be use what they call order out of chaos as a central tactics. How does that work? Well, the Matrix mind is obsessed with seeing the world in opposites. And if we look at the three-body problem in my previous post, it may indicate that the ruling elite need to manipulate society in ways that follow the two-body rule, because when three or more items are introduced the system generally becomes what in mathematics is called chaotic, which means that future outcomes are generally impossible to predict and therefore lead to a lack of control for those in power. This in turn means that the controllers need to keep things in monopoly or duality, such as Democrats vs Republicans, left vs right, abundance vs scarcity, lawful vs illegal, democracy vs dictatorship and so on.
And we can use that duality hypothesis to detect manipulations in society. Take the duality of smartphones for example. What duality? The duality of iPhone vs Android which together totally dominate the smartphone market. And that dominance can from a conspiracy theory perspective have been deliberately planned.
"Google boss Eric Schmidt left the board of rival company Apple "for the right reasons" -- because Apple didn't mind a conflict between Chrome and Safari but "really did mind" the conflict between the iPhone and Android." -- http://www.cnet.com/news/i-resigned-fro ... c-schmidt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Instead of it being a conflict between the Google boss and Apple, it was then (from the conspiracy perspective) in reality a cooperation between Google and Apple to totally dominate the smartphone software platform (OS) market. A similar scenario with Microsoft vs Apple when it comes to the dominating desktop OSs Windows and Mac (OS X).
Monopolies are of course even easier to control. If Google really had wanted to compete with Facebook, then they would have developed something much better than the halfhearted Google Plus. So there seems to be a monumental secret top-down control even in the corporate world.
The pharma industry has more than two corporations competing. There is however a duality even there. The duality is health care (governments, academia and the private sector) on one side and the pharma industry on the other side. The public has essentially zero influence on that process except watching ads and asking doctors to give them certain drugs. Unless you are an authority such as a politician or a member of a powerful NGO dealing with health care, mainstream scientist in medicine or a pharma industry boss, you just have to accept what those in power decide and take the drugs as they are or refuse them.
Being able to control things and events is good, but when done to such extent as in our society, it puts severe limits on our freedom of expression, choices and opportunities. It's important to also point out that this kind of limiting control probably has been needed for our civilization to be able to develop and to prevent it from deteriorating into chaos. One question is if we now have reached a moment in history where we can safely start to loosen up this rigid, hierarchical and top-down kind of control system.
I'm unsure if the control of money is a monopoly or a duality between the central bank and the government. In either case, it's a clear easy-to-control system. Those in power need simple systems like that. They can't efficiently handle more than two points of control! This leads to another possible conspiracy theory where there can be more than two mainstream media channels, yet the top control over all the mainstream media is likely a duality or a monopoly.
What we can do to break the duality spell is to instead of choosing this or that, to move into a third possibility. That will really make those in power start to shake in their boots.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCDIYvFmgW8[/youtube]
And we can use that duality hypothesis to detect manipulations in society. Take the duality of smartphones for example. What duality? The duality of iPhone vs Android which together totally dominate the smartphone market. And that dominance can from a conspiracy theory perspective have been deliberately planned.
"Google boss Eric Schmidt left the board of rival company Apple "for the right reasons" -- because Apple didn't mind a conflict between Chrome and Safari but "really did mind" the conflict between the iPhone and Android." -- http://www.cnet.com/news/i-resigned-fro ... c-schmidt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Instead of it being a conflict between the Google boss and Apple, it was then (from the conspiracy perspective) in reality a cooperation between Google and Apple to totally dominate the smartphone software platform (OS) market. A similar scenario with Microsoft vs Apple when it comes to the dominating desktop OSs Windows and Mac (OS X).
Monopolies are of course even easier to control. If Google really had wanted to compete with Facebook, then they would have developed something much better than the halfhearted Google Plus. So there seems to be a monumental secret top-down control even in the corporate world.
The pharma industry has more than two corporations competing. There is however a duality even there. The duality is health care (governments, academia and the private sector) on one side and the pharma industry on the other side. The public has essentially zero influence on that process except watching ads and asking doctors to give them certain drugs. Unless you are an authority such as a politician or a member of a powerful NGO dealing with health care, mainstream scientist in medicine or a pharma industry boss, you just have to accept what those in power decide and take the drugs as they are or refuse them.
Being able to control things and events is good, but when done to such extent as in our society, it puts severe limits on our freedom of expression, choices and opportunities. It's important to also point out that this kind of limiting control probably has been needed for our civilization to be able to develop and to prevent it from deteriorating into chaos. One question is if we now have reached a moment in history where we can safely start to loosen up this rigid, hierarchical and top-down kind of control system.
I'm unsure if the control of money is a monopoly or a duality between the central bank and the government. In either case, it's a clear easy-to-control system. Those in power need simple systems like that. They can't efficiently handle more than two points of control! This leads to another possible conspiracy theory where there can be more than two mainstream media channels, yet the top control over all the mainstream media is likely a duality or a monopoly.
What we can do to break the duality spell is to instead of choosing this or that, to move into a third possibility. That will really make those in power start to shake in their boots.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCDIYvFmgW8[/youtube]