The Mask of Fidelity

''Always be yourself, express yourself, have faith in yourself, do not go out and look for a successful personality and duplicate it.''
-Bruce Lee
Post Reply
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

The Mask of Fidelity

Post by Naga_Fireball »

From our marriage tombs, those cavern rooms, through the barred windows past which so many an Orpheus and Ophelia fair have plummeted, we lurk -- clutching the varied masks of fidelity.

Image

From the gates and ramparts, the needling watchtowers of Hell we have looked upon a greener pasture through borrowed eyes, and mindful of our bleak lot, we pitch our tents toward despair and self destruction.

Image

Sighing brief sighs of life through foreign lips, we sing the songs of other people who unashamedly describe the things of which we are afraid -- the things for which we tremble in abject humiliation.

Image

Wearing our stone, our wooden faces, our feathered masks and war paint of many colours, we deny the things we want and need, unable to unwear the mask, unable to breathe, to be oneself, to face each other with level eyes.

Image

We hide behind so many suns and moons, so many panthers and crocodiles and demon howls. We grin through stolen teeth the lie of happiness and twist the truth of grief into a thousand mysteries.

Image

The greatest mask of all is the mask of trueness, fidelity, oneness. Like an infinite hallway of mirrors and swords, spiraling into the depths of the universe, our true desires and motives lie beyond a billion different doors.

Image

A stranger could get lost in any one of them. Trapped, like an animal waiting for the hunter to return, but the hunter is dead, the hunt abandoned to time and the early grave.

Image

So many of our loves and lives end thus, yet we persist in complication, ruination, testing ourselves unto oblivion.

Image

Love is never finished destroying what we thought would never change. It is the sun and the water, the furnace and the hammer, to our pathetic mettle.
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Mask of Fidelity

Post by Naga_Fireball »

There ain't much good news today, but here is a very decent write up on how monogamy may be sort of a modern concept, or perhaps a cyclical practice among our species due to certain environmental pressures.

Although no one probably wants to be though of as being promiscuous, apparently there is some trauma & healing to be confronted through the very vital process of incorporating aspects of our sex lives into the general awakening we experience during midlife crisis.

Awakening may happen sooner to some people, but fundamentally is a sort of midlife crisis, the point at which we realize that the constructs we build in order to save ourselves from our hormones are not adequate and pre existing notions of our sexuality may need to be discarded, or maybe rediscovered and redefined.

Cnn does occasionally have something new on the bottom rails, lol.



Is sexual jealousy an inevitable part of relationships?
By Stephanie Fairyington


Updated 1:41 PM ET, Wed December 28, 2016

Stephanie Fairyington: The thought of sexual betrayal alone can feel unbearable

The maniacal levels of jealousy many of us reach when romantic trust is threatened or broken is innate, she says
Stephanie Fairyington (@Fairyington1) is a journalist in New York who writes on gender and sexuality. The opinions expressed in this commentary are hers.

(CNN)Showtime's provocative series "The Affair" follows the devastating aftershocks of an adulterous relationship between Noah Solloway (played by Dominic West), a married father of four, and a married waitress, Alison (Ruth Wilson). The mess that extends from their extramarital union includes the demise of two marriages, four troubled and bereft children, an unplanned pregnancy, an accidental homicide and an unjust incarceration.

Maura Tierney, who plays a deeply affecting Helen Solloway, Noah's abandoned wife, has said of the drama: "My friends who are couples, don't like to watch it together." As someone who struggles with sexual jealousy, which I believe is hardwired into us, I get why a couple might not want to preview the ugliness and suffering in store if they fail the expectation of fidelity. (Especially as it plays out on this show!) The thought of sexual betrayal alone can feel unbearable.

In an interview last summer, showrunner Sarah Treem put it this way: "A romantic relationship is like a triangle where both people lean in, creating a structure that holds both of them up. If one person is quote unquote "unfaithful," she said, "the structure collapses. If your relationship is the primary thing that holds up your house, and for most of us it is, then it's terrifying."

Author Dossie Easton, who co-wrote "The Ethical Slut," a guide to open relationships, has a less pragmatic and more philosophical -- and controversial -- take. She's long argued that sexual jealousy is a negative byproduct of the rigid expectations we've created around monogamy and marriage. She believes that the family structure would stay intact if we accepted our polyamorous natures and could "unlearn" sexual jealousy.

"Sexual jealousy is supposed to be somehow unconquerable and immovable," Easton told me. "But that is a myth. It's really serious emotional work to unlearn jealousy and cultivate other ways to feel secure in a relationship, but it's possible. I've been doing it in my practice for the past 20 years and in my own life since 1969."

Eminent family historian Stephanie Coontz's book "Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage" gives credence to Easton's claim. Coontz documents how marrying for love and expecting sexual fidelity for life is a fairly modern concept. Her research points to cultures across the globe and time, where people didn't exhibit signs of sexual jealousy in non-monogamous and non-romantic-love centric family structures. In ancient China, she reports, sisters recruited one another as "back-up" wives for their husbands. In Botswana, co-wives work with rather than against one another and value each other as mutual benefactors. "Among Tibetan brothers who share the same wife," Coontz writes, "sexual jealousy is rare."

I wonder, though, whether it's simply not expressed in ways that are intelligible to Western ethnographers.
Surely, sexual jealousy is a multi-headed beast with origins unique to each individual's background, but I think the maniacal levels of jealousy many of us reach when romantic trust is threatened or broken is innate, and that it triggers our memory of the primal scene of abandonment -- birth -- the moment we were permanently severed from the oneness we knew in utero.
Two psychoanalytic theories formulated by contemporaries of Sigmund Freud -- Austrian psychoanalyst Otto Rank and Hungarian psychoanalyst Sándor Ferenczi -- support that view.

"In 1924, Rank published 'The Trauma of Birth'," Peter L. Rudnytsky, a professor of English at the University of Florida and head of the Department of Academic and Professional Affairs of the American Psychoanalytic Association, said in a recent interview with me. "In it, he argued that the experience of separation from the mother's body is the primordial sense of loss that is recreated throughout the rest of one's life."

If you think about it from an infant's perspective, Rank's theory makes sense: You're sweetly nestled in your mother's womb. Nine months later, you're pushed out into a new world that likely feels vast and cold in stark contrast to the one you formerly inhabited. The blanket they quickly wrap you in is a sad and incomplete substitute for the perfect unity you knew before being born. And it's a unity, according to Rank's peer Ferenczi, that you'll seek in vain to forge in sexual and romantic coupling for the rest of your life because sex is the closest we can ever come to recreating the experience of the womb.

Metaphors in popular culture and literature abound that bear out our desire to become a single unit with one another: Remember when Tom Cruise's Jerry Maguire tells his devoted assistant Dorothy Boyd (Renée Zellweger), "You complete me"? Or, when singer Stacey Q croons on her '80s hit, "Two of hearts, two hearts that beat as one." Or, when Catherine Earnshaw in Emily Bronte's "Wuthering Heights" says of her childhood love, Heathcliff: "Nelly, I am Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being."

The inflammatory emotions that even the fear or suspicion of infidelity triggers may stem from the threat of losing the illusion of oneness we find in coupledom.
It may also conjure our infant vulnerabilities and post-birth fears of abandonment. As babies, we're the most vulnerable animals on the planet. If our parents don't feed, clothe, bathe, shelter and interact with us, we'll likely die. Given that romantic attachments re-enact the ones we had with our first loves, our parents, it's not surprising that the prospect of abandonment can feel, well, deadly. The sentient memory of our complete and profound dependence on our first caretakers follows us in every succeeding love relationship.

"The essence of love has to be the possibility of loss," Rudnytsky said, when asked what he makes of couples who are uncomfortable watching "The Affair." "If we choose to commit to a faithful monogamous relationship freely," he added, "then presumably we do so with the knowledge that it's not inevitable." And that reminder, for many of us, is deeply unsettling.

Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
Post Reply

Return to “Express yourself”