Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

"The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."
-Albert Einstein
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

I never heard of Acharya before. He teaches http://dharmacentral.com/meaning-of-san ... ticle.html
Off Topic
The prevalence of Dharma, under a variety of different names, has been demonstrated to exist in almost every pre-Christian civilization and culture in the world. It is thus the common heritage of a large majority of the earth’s inhabitants. As expressed in the specific tradition of “Hinduism” (properly known as “Sanatana Dharma”), the metaphysical concept of Dharma is both a spiritual path, as well as a comprehensive ideology and world-view that directly informs the realms of politics, social theory, economics, culture theory, architecture, medicine, religion, aesthetics, martial warfare, philosophy, ethics, mathematics, and every other aspect of human concern.

Though the concept of Dharma is the earliest concept known to humanity, it is a world-view that is hardly relegated to a hoary and obsolete past. Rather, the positive, life-affirming principles of Dharma have proven themselves to be as relevant today as they have ever been. In the following philosophical exposition and practical manifesto of Dharma, we will explore the meaning of Dharma, and how to maximally utilize the unlimited benefits that Dharma can offer us, our families, and our troubled world today.

The earliest instances of the concept of Dharma in world history are first found in the most ancient literature known to humanity, the Vedic literature of India. The Vedas were first composed in Sanskrit approximately 3800 BC. Previous to even this time, this literature is known to have been preserved orally, and passed down from generation to generation before finally being committed to writing. Thus, no one can accurately date the antiquity of the Vedas and consequently of Dharma. Dharma is one of the most ancient concepts known to humanity. The word “Dharma” is found repeatedly throughout the entire corpus of the Vedic scriptures, from the earliest Rig Veda to the Bhagavad Gita. There is almost no scripture in the entirety of the Vedic literature where one will not come across the word “Dharma” as the preeminent name of the religio-philosophical world-view taught in these ancient, sacred texts. Sometimes the word “Dharma” is used by itself; at other times it is used in conjunction with other qualifying words, such as “Vaidika Dharma” (Vedic Dharma), “Vishva Dharma” (Global Dharma), “Yoga Dharma” (the Dharma of Union), or more frequently as "Sanatana Dharma" (the Eternal Way). The diversity of adjectival emphasis will vary in accordance with the precise context in which the word is used. Of these terms, the name “Sanatana Dharma” has been the most widely used name of the path of Truth, and is used as far back as the Rig Veda, the very earliest scripture of the Indo-European peoples, and the earliest written text known to humanity. It is also the most philosophically profound and conceptually beautiful name for the path of Truth.

While some reading this work have no doubt encountered the term “Sanatana Dharma” (The Eternal Natural Way) before, not everyone is necessarily as familiar with the full philosophical implications of the term’s meaning. Thus it is necessary to explicate the term’s full meaning in depth. The Sanskrit word "sanatana" is the easier of the two words to translate into non-Sanskritic languages. It denotes that which always is, that which has neither beginning nor end, that which is eternal in its very essence. The concept of eternality that the word “sanatana” is trying to convey is a radically different concept than is ordinarily understood in the Western Abrahamic religions. When the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam employ the concept of eternality, what is usually being communicated is that x thing, having come into being, will never come to an end. In other words, “eternal” for the Abrahamic religions, usually refers only to the future. It is a unidirectional concept. A more accurate term for this Abrahamic concept is thus “everlasting”, rather than “eternal” proper.

In Sanatana Dharma, however, the concept of eternality denotes something quite different from the standard Abrahamic notion. The Dharmic idea of eternality is nuanced with a subtlety and sophistication that is not easily copied in the West. For eternality refers in the Dharmic context to both an infinitely non-ending past, as well as future. In this more expansive and bi-directional model of eternality, the concept of sanatana extends not only into the infinite recesses of the future, but into the past as well. By referring to something as “sanatana”, the idea is that an eternal object will not only never come to an end, but that it has also always existed in the past as well. Something that is eternal has necessary existence. That is, it is not possible to even conceive of such a thing not existing. Thus, God (Brahman), the individual self (atman), prime materiality (jagat, or prakriti), Truth (satya), the Veda (Truth rendered into literary form), and Dharma itself all have necessary existence. They always have been - and they always shall be.

Thus, the Dharma that is the subject of this work is necessarily an ever-living Dharma. The focus of this book is living and dynamic Dharma, and not merely a static concept. The term “living Dharma” is of course a double entendre. This work is dedicated to uncovering how: A) Dharma is alive today, and B) How to live Dharma in today’s world.

What is the Concept of Dharma

Unlike the word “sanatana”, the term ''dharma" is a word that can be properly rendered into the English language only with the greatest of difficulty. This is the case because there is no one corresponding English term that fully renders both the denotative and the connotative meanings of the term with maximal sufficiency. When translators (and especially professors of “South Asian Studies”) have attempted to translate the term “dharma” into English, they have often been forced to betray the real essence of the term, and have instead clumsily relied on secondary attributes of the term’s real meaning. Often “dharma” has been inelegantly translated as “righteousness”, “religion”, “law”, “duty”, “the way”, “morality”, etc. While these terms are not incorrect per se, all of these attempts at translation are merely descriptions of the parts of Dharma. But the actual essence of Dharma lies behind them all.

Rather than merely communicating a nominal subject for which there can be an easy word-for-word equivalency, the Sanskrit term “dharma” is an attempt at communicating the elaborate nuances of a metaphysical concept. So, if we wanted to properly translate into the English language what the term “dharma” is actually attempting to communicate, rather than using a single word to do so, we would need to use a paragraph!

The word “dharma” is etymologically derived from the Sanskrit verb root “dhr”, meaning “to sustain”, “to uphold”, “to support”, etc. And it is in these verbal derivative meanings that we can begin to clearly detect the precise idea that the term “dharma” is attempting to communicate.

The denotative meaning of "dharma" straightforwardly designates an essential attribute of x object - an attribute whose absence renders the object devoid of either rational meaning or existential significance. An existent thing’s dharma is that which constitutes the thing’s very essence, without which, the very concept of the thing would be rendered meaningless. In the pre-Abrahamic (and thus Dharmic) Greco-Roman world, the great Pagan philosopher Aristotle wrote about the inherent essentiality of all individual things, and agreed that all things have a primary essential attribute, without which it would be left devoid of meaning. Everything in existence has a dharma (essential attribute), because everything has an essence. Thus, essence ontologically precedes and gives both form and meaning to existence.

To illustrate the full meaning of this term, we can use the following examples: It is the dharma, or essence, of water to be wet. Without the essential attribute (dharma) of wetness, the concept and existential fact of water loses all meaning. It is literally impossible for us to even imagine what it would mean to drink water that wasn’t wet. Likewise, it is the dharma, or essence, of fire to be hot. If we had a fire that didn’t have the property of heat emanating from it, we wouldn’t have fire at all. The fire’s very essence would be missing. Thus, the existent fire would lose its existence due to a lack of essence. The dharma of space is to be expansive, and the dharma of time is to be ever-progressing. An almost infinite number of similar such examples can be given. Thus it is the intrinsic dharma of any particular thing that makes it unique, and that gives its existence sustenance and meaning. Dharma sustains.

This more straightforward, denotative meaning of dharma is easy enough to comprehend. It is, however, when we come to the more important connotative meaning of the term "dharma" that we then leave the more philosophical concerns of microcosmic physics behind, and then enter the realm of the overtly metaphysical. Going from the microcosmic to the more macrocosmic significance of the term “dharma”, we begin to understand the profound power of this concept.

For, according to the ancient Vedic tradition itself, the very empirical cosmos in which we find ourselves currently situated also has its own inherent dharma, its own essential attributive nature, without which the universe and reality around us becomes meaningless. Just as every individual component of the world around us has its own inherent dharma on a microcosmic scale, similarly, the world itself has its own inherent essential nature. In this more macro-cosmological sense, the term dharma is designed to communicate the view that there is an underlying structure of natural law – a natural and intelligent order - that is inherent in the very intrinsic constitution of Being itself. The universe itself has its own dharma.

The currently dominant secular-materialist world-view, the foundations upon which rests many of the most fundamental presuppositions, dogmas and articles of faith of modernity, postulates a world that is devoid of inherent meaning and purpose. In the opinion of post-Enlightenment Era secular-materialism, our world does not have a transcendent basis upon which it depends, but rather our world is a reality that is ethically relativistic, philosophically meaningless, devoid of a Divine intelligence responsible for its otherwise obvious orderly nature, and is thus a reality that is ultimately rendered absurd.

The Vedic world-view, by stark contrast, sees the universe in a very different light. Our world, according to Dharma, is a place that is replete with inherent meaning, value, and an intelligent design underlying its physical principles and laws, as well as a transcendent purpose that, while not necessarily discernable via empirical means, nonetheless forms a very concrete spiritual basis of all empirical reality. The material, according to Dharma, finds its origin and sustaining ground in the spiritual. The spiritual necessarily precedes the material. The world is here for a purpose – and that purpose is God’s purpose.

The Principles of Dharma:

The following is a short list detailing some of the practical Dharmic values and principles to be lived in everyday life. By adopting a Dharma lifestyle, you can ensure a greater degree of happiness and prosperity both personally, and for society as a whole.

1. Reverence for nature, and deep environmentalism
2. God-centeredness
3. Nobility in all thoughts, words, and deeds
4. Cultivating a Life of Ethical Virtues
5. Recognition of the Feminine aspect of the Divine
6. Unity in Diversity
7. Respect for all Living Beings
8. Organic Living
9. Following a Natural and Organic Approach to Health
10. Meditation
11. Veneration and Reverence for our Ancestors
12. Self-Realization and Self-Knowledge
13. Acquiring Wisdom
14. Health: physical, mental, and spiritual
15. Cleanliness in Body, Mind, and Environment
16. Seeking Excellence in all Things
17. Humility
18. Fearlessness
19. Self-Discipline
20. Strong and Healthy Family Units
21. Admiration of Beauty
22. Honesty
23. Loyalty
24. Simplicity
25. Truthfulness

The word “dharma”, in this more important philosophical sense, refers to those underlying natural principles that are inherent in the very structure of reality, ordering our world as the metaphysical backdrop to the drama of everyday phenomenal existence, and that has their origin in the causeless will of God. Dharma is Natural Law. Thus, if we needed to render the entire term “Sanatana Dharma” into English, we can cautiously translate it as "The Eternal Natural Way".

Sanatana Dharma is a spiritual path that is open to all sincere spiritual seekers regardless of their ethnicity or nationality.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/CojRdFOQ-tg[/youtube]
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

This is off the top of my head. I read before that as evolution progresses, we are reaching deeper levels of our Body to be conscious in our mundane life. The Vedas speak of the bodies from gross physical into deeper and finer states given names like etheric or mental or noetic. I read that the mental body is awakening in this cycle of evolution and we are more and more aware of how thoughts matter in our "reality" of perception.
Off Topic
The Mental Body is our vehicle of expression for intellect, ideas and thoughts. It can have healthy or unhealthy activity and thoughts. The mental body can be undercharged or overcharged; we can describe someone as a bright student, which reflects the appearance of a healthy mental body and the third layer of their energy field would be pulsating bright yellow energy.
Thoughts can become holding patterns on this level. Healers can actually tune in and hear some of these thought forms in someone’s energy field.
A healthy mental body would have clarity and a clear thought process. If it was unhealthy it would be squashing the emotional level, this is very common with our education system. We become thinkers and not used to feeling. Or the emotional level could overwhelm the mental level, so we would have lots of emotional process with little clarity.
This is the level where we hold our thought forms. Thinking does not only happen in the brain, each cell in our body is conditioned by the thoughts we have. This web of mental energy affects our emotional and physical well-being.https://soul-essence.com/2009/02/20/hum ... ntal-body/
The thought I had this evening is about energy flowing from the innermost connection with God (by any name). IF IMO one is taking energy from this source, it bubbles out and cleanses the bodies. It might seem so simplistic but one who knows to seek this connection, just happens to be in transformation to full realization in unity moment by moment. It happens by itself. Only the most sweeping sublime thoughts can describe the awesome state of being connected to energy that can do everything needed for us. I think grace, harmonic superlatives and excessive praise.

Something quite fantastic happens when seeking the inner most Godness in our essence. The individual mind just knows that the essence of All is gOod. WE know WE are good. This is where our mind and Divine mind touch. WHY? Because mind will only allow the Divine Light to illumine perception when personae knows one's innate goodness. I say the personal mind can KNOW more and more genius as one loves oneself more and more inseparably from the love of Creator and all manifested form. This opens the door between our own realms of vibration. The learning becomes intense, but full of assurance. Everything starts looking different with thoughts of trust in goodness. Love changes us organically on the path to our unfolding with ease and grace by asking for communion.

I am bumping this here... for the sublime thoughts spoken.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/lOO6kR69PXM[/youtube]
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

Lists. What IS it that makes writing a list helpful? I have never used lists and am reconsidering my strategy to systems building.

I am struggling with all the stuff in my life, the cobwebs, the management of my living space. I just wrote an affirmation " Cleaning house is FUN" at the top of listing what will be the steps to a clean house for the holidays. I am procrastinating. This post is a message in the bottle sent out for the forces that aid me in doing chores that are avoided due to overwhelm in mundane choreland.
Off Topic
Almost everyone struggles with getting stuff done. But some of us struggle with the stage before that: just figuring out what it is we need to do. The to-do list is, in theory, the answer. It’s a time-honoured system that’s beautiful in its simplicity: work out what needs to be done and in what order, write down the tasks, do them, and then, one-by-one, cross them out.

Psychologist and author Dr David Cohen believes his struggle to stay organised is helped, but not entirely solved, by his to-do lists, which must be on paper – preferably in a diary – and need to be constantly monitored. “My family think I’m chaotic,” he says, “but I would be much more so without my lists – they’ve kept me in line for years.”

Cohen puts our love of to-do lists down to three reasons: they dampen anxiety about the chaos of life; they give us a structure, a plan that we can stick to; and they are proof of what we have achieved that day, week or month.

A system is needed – and scribbled notes on hands won’t cut it.
In less harried days, our memories might have done the work. Russian psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik was perhaps the first to note the brain’s obsession with pressing tasks. The so-called “Zeigarnik effect” – that we remember things we need to do better than things we’ve done – stemmed from observing that waiters could only recall diners’ orders before they had been served. After the dishes had been delivered, their memories simply erased who’d had the steak and who’d had the soup. The deed was done and the brain was ready to let go.

More recently, a study by professors Baumeister and Masicampo from Wake Forest University showed that, while tasks we haven’t done distract us, just making a plan to get them done can free us from this anxiety. The pair observed that people underperform on a task when they are unable to finish a warm-up activity that would usually precede it. However, when participants were allowed to make and note down concrete plans to finish the warm-up activity, performance on the next task substantially improved. As Bechman notes: “Simply writing the tasks down will make you more effective.”

Some people resist this kind of structure, however. They think it will stymie their creativity or prevent them from being flexible with their working day. For time management expert David Allen – whose book Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity has made him a cult figure in the field –these free-spirited types are plain wrong. He believes anyone with a full schedule and no structure will struggle to cope. A system is needed – and scribbled notes on hands won’t cut it.

“Write my novel” is a pretty foreboding task; “outline first chapter of my novel” is far friendlier
It’s not enough to scrawl “bank” or “Mum” on a Post-it note, says Allen – you need more detail. Is it an email, a visit or a phone call, and for what purpose? If your to-do list isn’t clear and to the point, your tasks probably won’t get done – and they certainly won’t be prioritised.

Detail isn’t the only important factor, however: you also need to be realistic about how long things will take if you want to construct a workable timetable for the day. That means factoring in the potential for floating off onto social media or other distractions if you know you’re susceptible.

One trap people fall into is to consistently avoid tackling the larger, more major projects. The best way to overcome this is to break them down into much smaller, achievable blocks. “Write my novel” is a pretty foreboding task; “outline first chapter of my novel” is far friendlier and stands a chance of getting done.

Does Cohen finish everything on his lists? “Oh God no! I found an old diary the other day from six years ago, and there was something in there that I still haven’t done.” On the other hand, he has written 35 books – on subjects ranging from body language to Sigmund Freud’s cocaine use – so his to-do lists are yielding pretty impressive results.https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... ered-tasks
The THING about mundane life is that it is built by actions. I admit I often have preferred to think about life rather than do much. But I am the agency who creates the life I am leading. I really WOULD enjoy a simple, clean, beautiful environment and sense I am the one to DO this action, I know there are skill sets I can start practicing.

The reason I am sharing this post is so I can procrastinate hehe. Also, I want to express the sense we all have immediate power to make change when we practice. My intention is to have my list done before Wednesday night, interspersed with work and shopping. I am looking forward to the feeling of satisfaction of having my brothers and their wives enjoying my clean house.

Here's something I will listen to tonight. I think self hypnosis could help. Again, I have never put the systematic application to a test. It is suggested that self hypnosis needs about 2-3 weeks of using for best results.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/l7SbP1D8wJY[/youtube]

And I am intending cleaning of my inner space at the same time.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/vYp-Y3UiCh8[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/kD6cFScno-Y[/youtube]
Sandy Clark
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:38 am
Location: Saskatoon, Sk. Canada
Has thanked: 1610 times
Been thanked: 587 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by Sandy Clark »

Boy I needed this Maggie>>>>>thanks / Hugs
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

Sandy Clark wrote:Boy I needed this Maggie>>>>>thanks / Hugs
Best wishes for your practice.

I am taking a break and found this video from Walter Russell.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/Q0O1_lLWmY4[/youtube]

I had read a youtube comment of criticism from one of the students of Walter Russell. Robert Otey disparaged what he thinks is "new age" in Walter Russell's personal philosophy. He focuses on the science presented by Russell.

BUT IMO Walter balanced his use of mental equipment, feeling and action in all different directions of Science, Religion, Magic and Art in his life.

AGAIN I am reminded of the book I am reading that discusses the various cultures: Science, Religion, Magic and Art. Perspective within the the various cultures is built on belief and can seem the TRUTH. We IMO as the observer OF culture need to discern form Universal principles and IMO Walter Russell has shown how his enlightening manifested a really powerful life. I think that means he is trust worthy.

He was committed to the ideal of humanity evolving: YES, to live in a Newly experienced age of knowing cause. Based on our own connection to light, we each will know the cause of the simulation which we perceive in the dual thinking of the one light. This will change EVERYTHING.

Back to cleaning I am listening to this again (heard it some time ago).

[youtube]https://youtu.be/zDeCaJeARQw[/youtube]
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

Now I am listening to this book and I am not surprised at all that it expresses my own deep core explanation The Universal One by Walter Russell.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/TheUnive ... ussell.pdf

I appreciate Grace Butler for reading the book.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/h75BTk3oj4U[/youtube]
User avatar
Christine
Site Admin
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:29 pm
Has thanked: 4419 times
Been thanked: 4705 times
Contact:

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by Christine »

I love cleaning house and washing dishes! Honestly the mundane activities we engage in are the perfect field where the voice of inspiration is often heard. It's when we don't embrace these activities and confine them to "stuff I have to or hate doing" then the magic is lost.
Image
The journey, the challenge is to step into the
projection room and stop being lost in the script.
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

This was the best Thanksgiving week EVER. I had a whole week visit from my brother whom I love dearly. He fixed things for me and was extravagant in gifts like gravel on the drive as a christmas present. Now I have a real driveway. I saw symbolic meaning in what he brought : more light (new outside and laundry room light fixtures), easier passage (the driveway). He was the hand in a magical way these luxuries appeared.

Magic is grabbing my attention BE CAUSE it seems to me that we have seen already how in this experience, the underlying principles are the important mastery. Magic is an art of change in accordance with will. What we will can as easily be for superficial or deep change IF we know that all the material world is just the expression of what is imagined. When commerce and politics and art and religion persuade us to imagine an importance in their products, we have THAT product. If we imagine what WE want and know is important BE CAUSE we decided, the elements form OUR choice. I would prefer my choice and my focus to manifest which IMO is using a whole technology that is practical.

"Like branding, Chaos Magic is mostly concerned with
inception. But where branding is about implanting ideas in the
brains of an audience, Chaos Magic is about implanting ideas
into your own."
Off Topic
K-HOLE #5
A REPORT ON DOUBT
“Seeing the future ≠ changing the future.”

CHAOS MAGI
The fundamental element of magic is the ability to manifest or
sublimate things, whether they’re emotions, states of being,
people, or the Statue of Liberty. Magic is the art of making
things appear or disappear, out of nowhere or into the void.
This magic, the lady-in-a-box, rabbit-in-a-hat form of magic,
is predicated on two questions: where did she go? And how
did we get here? When you’re a baby, things are constantly
appearing out of fucking nowhere and vanishing with no hope
of return, until at some point you learn pattern recognition.
But let’s not forget that on some level believing that the sun
will rise again is rooted in magical thinking.

“My ex-boyfriend used to tell me witches are real in Colombia
— because everyone believes in them.” Belief at an individual
level changes you, and belief at a collective level changes the
world. But if you believe something strongly enough, can you
morph the individual into the collective?

Over cheeseburgers and beer, a friend explained an idea we
were bound to ruin: Chaos Magic. On a bargain basement level,
Chaos Magic lives in the same realm as the cult of positive
thinking. But it goes beyond making mood boards of highend
apartments you’d like to will into your possession. Belief
becomes a technology that creates change.

CHAOS MAGIC
Chaos Magic creates realities which are temporary and
subjective. It’s not a tool for changing others — it’s a tool for
changing yourself. You opt into whatever belief system you
think will help you reach your intended goals: Wall Street’s
Confidence Fairy, your Fairy Godmother, or the Church of
Agape. Chaos Magic isn’t just believing in The Secret, it’s
deciding to believe in The Secret to begin with. Mixing your
own Kool-Aid, deciding how strong to make it, knowing when
to drink it and when to stop, is Chaos Magic in practice. It’s
radical DIY that uses reality as the only necessary operating
system. This is not to say that Kool-Aid will always take you on
the path you intended. Drink too much and you might end up
lost, alone, or dead.

LOST, ALONE,
OR DEAD

Chaos Magic is what happens after will. It’s the antidote to the
try hard problems that come with overthinking everything. If
you really want change you have to go deeper.
Like branding, Chaos Magic is mostly concerned with
inception. But where branding is about implanting ideas in the
brains of an audience, Chaos Magic is about implanting ideas
into your own. Both practices depend heavily on the creation of
sigils + mantras. There is a tight homology here:
SIGIL = LOGO
MANTRA = SLOGAN

One guide says for your magic to work, you should make a
sigil, forget about it, then stare at it at the moment of climax.
Fuck someone wearing Chanel, stare at the label while you’re
cumming, and you’ll become Karl Lagerfeld. Chaos Magic, like
branding, is desire doomed to be commercial.

CHAOS MAGIC
With respect to magic, our friends, Chronos, and God,
we’re going to try to avoid ruining the problem. The
fuzzy uncertainty that floats around the idea of magic
is more important than a slapdash explanation of how
magic works.

K-HOLE took a stab at answering a few questions: Do we
use magic? Do brands use magic? Does magic exist, or is
it just a placeholder for our ignorance? Are we hearing
voices, doing voices, or both? (get the pdf here http://khole.net/issues/05/)

CHAOS MAGIC
HACK YOUR
LIZARD
Off Topic
PARADIGM SHIFTS AND AEONICS
by Pete Carroll
All the philosophies, creeds, dogmas and beliefs that humanity has evolved are variants of three great paradigms, the Transcendental, the Materialist and the Magical. In no human culture has any one of these paradigms been completely distinct from the others. For example, in our own culture at the time of writing the Transcendental and Magical paradigms are frequently confused together.

Transcendental philosophies are basically religious and manifest in a spectrum stretching from the fringes of primitive spiritism through pagan polytheism to the monotheism of the Judaeo-Christian-Islamic traditions and the theoretical non-theistic systems of Buddhism and Taoism. In each case it is believed that some form of consciousness or spirit created and maintains the universe and that humans, other living organisms, contain some fragment of this consciousness or spirit which underlies the veil or illusion of matter. The essence of Transcendentalism is belief in spiritual beings greater than oneself or states of spiritual being superior to that which currently one enjoys. Earthly life is frequently seen merely as a form of dialogue between oneself and one's deity or deities, or perhaps some impersonal form of higher force. The material world is a theatre for the spirit or soul or consciousness that created it. Spirit is the ultimate reality to the transcendentalist.

In the Materialist paradigm the universe is believed to consist fundamentally and entirely of matter. Energy is but a form of matter and together they subtend space and time within which all change occurs strictly on the basis of cause and effect. Human behaviour is reducible to biology, biology is reducible to chemistry, chemistry is reducible to physics and physics is reducible to mathematics. Mind and consciousness are thus merely electrochemical events in the brain and spirit is a word without objective content. The causes of some events are likely to remain obscure perhaps indefinitely, but there is an underlying faith that sufficient material cause must exist for any event. All human acts can be categorized as serving some biological need or as expressions of previously applied conditioning or merely as malfunction. The goal of materialist who eschews suicide is the pursuit of personal satisfaction including altruistic satisfactions if desired.

The main difficulty in recognizing and describing the pure Magical Paradigm is that of insufficient vocabulary. Magical philosophy is only recently recovering from a heavy adulteration with transcendental theory. The word aether will be used to describe the fundamental reality of the magical paradigm. It is more or less equivalent to the idea of Mana used in oceanic shamanism. Aether in materialistic descriptions is information which structures matter and which all matter is capable of emitting and receiving. In transcendental terms aether is a sort of “life force” present in some degree in all things. It carries both knowledge about events and the ability to influence similar or sympathetic events. Events either arise spontaneously out of themselves or are encouraged to follow certain paths by influence of patterns in the aether. As all things have an aetheric part they can be considered to be alive in some sense. Thus all things happen by magic, the large scale features of the universe have a very strong aetheric pattern which makes them fairly predictable but difficult to influence by the aetheric patterns created by thought. Magicians see themselves as participating in nature. Transcendentalists like to think they are somehow above it. Materialists like to try and manipulate it.

Now this universe has the peculiarly accommodating property of tending to provide evidence for, and confirmation of, whatever paradigm one chooses to believe in. Presumably at some deep level there is a hidden symmetry between those things we call Matter, Aether and Spirit. Indeed, it is rare to find an individual or culture operating exclusively on a single one of these paradigms and none is ever entirely absent. Non dominant paradigms are always present as superstitions and fears. A subsequent section on Aeonics will attempt to untangle the influences of each of these great world views throughout history, to see how they have interacted with each other and to predict future trends. In the meantime an analysis of the radically differing concepts of time and self in each paradigm is offered to more fully distinguish the basic ideas.

Transcendentalists conceive of time in millennial and apocalyptic terms. Time is regarded as having a definite beginning and ending, both initiated by the activities of spiritual beings or forces. The end of time on the personal and cosmic scale is regarded not so much as a cessation of being but as a change to a state of non material being. The beginning of personal and cosmic time is similarly regarded as a creative act by spiritual agencies. Thus reproductive activity usually becomes heavily controlled and hedged about with taboo and restriction in religious cultures, as it implies an usurpation of the powers of deities. Reproduction also implies that death has in some measure been overcome. How awesome the power of creation and how final must earthly death subconsciously loom to a celibate and sterile priesthood.

All transcendentalisms embody elements of apocalypticism. Typically these are used to provoke revivals when business is slack or attention is drifting elsewhere. Thus it is suddenly revealed that the final days are at hand or that some earthly dispute is in fact a titanic battle against evil spiritual agencies.

Materialist time is linear but unbounded. Ideally it can be extended arbitrarily far in either direction from the present. To the strict materialist it is self-evidently futile to speculate about a beginning or an end to time. Similarly the materialist is contemptuous of any speculations about any forms of personal existence before birth or after death. The materialist may well fear painful or premature death but can have no fears about being dead.

The magical view is that time is cyclic and that all processes recur. Even cycles which appear to begin or end are actually parts of larger cycles. Thus all endings are beginnings and the end of time is synonymous with the beginning of time in another universe. The magical view that everything is recycled is reflected in the doctrine of reincarnation. The attractive idea of reincarnation has often persisted into the religious paradigm and many pagan and even some monotheist traditions have retained it. However religious theories invariably contaminate the original idea with beliefs about a personal soul. From a strictly magical viewpoint we are an accretion rather than an unfolded unity. The psyche has no particular centre, we are colonial beings, a rich collage of many selves. Thus as our bodies contain fragments from countless former beings, so does our psyche. However certain magical traditions retain techniques which allow the adept to transfer quite large amounts of his psyche in one piece should he consider this more useful than dispersing himself into humanity at large.

Each of the paradigms take a different view of the self. Transcendentalists view self as spirit inserted into matter. As a fragment or figment of deity the self regards itself as somehow placed in the world in a non arbitrary manner and endowed with free will. The transcendental view of self is relatively stable and non-problematic if shared as a consensus with all significant others. However, transcendental theories about the placement and purpose of self and its relationship to deities are mutually exclusive. Conflicting transcendentalisms can rarely co-exist for they threaten to disconform the images of self. Encounters which are not decisive tend to be mutually negatory in the long run.

Of the three views of self the purely materialistic one is the most problematical. If mind is an extension of matter it must obey material laws and the resulting deterministic view conflicts with the subjective experience of free will. On the other hand, if mind and consciousness are assumed to be qualitatively different from matter then the self is incomprehensible to itself in material terms. Worse still perhaps, the materialist self must regard itself as a phenomenon of only temporary duration in contradiction of the subjective expectation of continuity of consciousness. Because a purely materialist view of self is so austere few are prepared to confront such naked existentialism. Consequently materialist cultures exhibit a frantic appetite for sensation, identification and more or less disposable irrational beliefs. Anything that will make the self seem less insubstantial.

The magical view of self is that it is based on the same random capricious chaos which makes the universe exist and do what it does. The magical self has no centre, it is not a unity but an assemblage of parts, any number of which may temporarily club together and call themselves “I”. This accords with the observation that our subjective experience consists of our various selves experiencing each other. Free will arises either as an outcome of a dispute between our various selves or as a sudden random creation of a new idea or option. In the magical view of self there is no spirit/matter or mind/body split and the paradoxes of free will and determinism disappear. Some of our acts arise from random choices between conditioned options and some from conditional choices between randomly created options. In practice most of our acts are based on rather complex hierarchical sequences of all four of these mechanisms. As soon as we have acted one of our selves proclaims “I did that!” so loudly that most of the other selves think they did it too.

Each of the three views of self has something derogatory to say about the other two. From the standpoint of the transcendental self the materialist self has become prey to pride of intellect, the demon hubris, whilst the magical view of self is considered to be entirely demonic. The material self views the transcendentalist as obsessed with assumptions having no basis in fact, and the magical self as being childlike and incoherent. From the standpoint of the magical view, the assorted selves of the transcendentalist have ascribed a grossly exaggerated importance to one or a few of the selves which they call God or gods, whilst the materialist has attempted to make all his selves subordinate to the self that does the rational thinking. Ultimately it's a matter of faith and taste.

The transcendentalist has faith in his god self, the materialist has faith in his reasoning self and the selves of the magician have faith in each other. Naturally, all these forms of faith are subject to periods of doubt.

Last modified: 2017/01/14 17:35by John Bell
https://hermetic.com/chaos/paradigm-shifts-and-aeonics
Off Topic
My Years of Magical Thinking, by Lionel Snell https://www.amazon.co.uk/Years-Magical- ... 0904311244

Lionel Snell is without doubt one of the great magical thinkers of the last half-century. This book is somewhat different to his other books, because he is offering his arguments to the wider public beyond the magical ghetto. It is a concerted defence of magical thinking - but as one of four basic types of thinking, four basic human ways of apprehending our worlds.

This four-directions model is not new - Snell's first book, SSOTBME, from 1974, laid out this model of human apprehension, but I must confess I never got that it was supposed to be a normal mode of thinking; somehow I assumed he was smuggling it in to complete his picture, and that it was still a fringe thing. Thinking back, I am puzzled at how I misread that idea, but it no doubt has to do with the fact that my own approach to magical thinking has often emphasized the fringe-y, even freakish nature of such thinking - the freakiness of which I am quite comfortable with.

Snell is careful to explain that this is not a map of 4 quadrants, into which all thinking can be neatly stuffed, but a compass of 4 directions, tendencies. These tendencies do have at their core some ideal kind of thinking which is of course always referred to, often emulated but never achieved in a pure form. He points out that this model is in itself an example of magical thinking, and is aware of the price we pay for making systems:
'No theory can claim maturity until it has been accused of being "a gross over-simplification".'

So what are the characteristics of the 4 types of thinking?

Magical thinking is based on a combination of feeling and sensation - we gather evidence directly via sensation and then decide how to act by what 'feels right.'
This is a fast mode of processing, much faster than Scientific thinking's combination of sensation and thinking. So it is much more useful in a pinch. I was reminded of the words of one of my favourite songwriters, Arthur Lee, when he sings: 'I believe in magic / Why? Because it is so quick / I don't need power when I'm hypnotized...'

Here is an elegant indicator of Religious thinking:
'...a notion has no religious meaning unless it is capable of being disbelieved (for otherwise there would be no non-believers from which the believers could differentiate themselves).'

Magical thinking is characterized by an inclusiveness of thought:
'In magical culture, a belief in any one system does not compel disbelief in another system that contradicts it, and this sets magical thinking apart from religious or scientific use of the word "belief`".'

For example:
'...I clearly accept the theory of evolution as a myth. I accept the myth that consciousness is generated within my brain, because that too works well for me - but it does not stop me also accepting the myth that I have an immortal soul that has incarnated in this body because that also works well in other contexts. I can at the same time accept the myth that light is a wave as well as the myth that light is made of particles, as both those myths work for me in their own way.'

Magical thinking also involves a game-like approach to life, not taking belief in what you are doing too seriously. The edges of magic, perhaps on the Science side of the compass, show up where:
'You do find magicians apparently so serious about a particular set of symbols that they appear to have accepted it as "absolutely true". Does that mean they are no longer playing a game?'

In contrast, the attitude of the official game-playing world of sport is much more serious, and Lionel puts it under Religious thinking, in which we have to believe in one thing and exclude all others, belong to one in-group and relegate all other people to the out-group.

The edges of Scientific thinking are interesting. Snell shows how theoretical physics is Platonism, of a peculiar kind:
'For example, any experiment as experienced subjectively by a scientist must be assumed to have a one-to-one relationship with an experiment taking place in the higher Platonic reality of a physical universe that is assumed to "really exist" and whose shadow or image makes up the experimenter's subjective experience.'

Plato, as I read him, is talking about subjectivity, and therefore the ideal states he talks about are subjective ones, and our discrimination around them is what leads us to spiritual awakening. But in our post-Cartesian world, spirit and even consciousness is rejected as being too difficult to understand, so theoreticians like Dennett and Dawkins pretend it doesn't exist (the most ridiculous philosophical position imaginable, since consciousness is the only prime datum we have). So instead physicists have projected an ideal out onto the external world, of an objective existence behind what we experience but which we can never reach.

The final section addresses some issue in the modern world. Snell tells us we are living in a culture where magical thinking is once again rising to prominence. This is of course not all good - it is the sort of era when some pundit in all seriousness can coin the phrase 'post-truth', a world in which prominent figures are not even shamed when their lies are revealed. http://chaotopia-dave.blogspot.com/2017 ... ionel.html
User avatar
maggie
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 4:09 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 732 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by maggie »

If we are moving into a "space" where each of us can enjoy exactly what we commit to feeling and thinking, IMO personal integrity, our choices as free will and our experiences as unique create a very different general paradigm. For one thing, it supports some of the maps (an intellectual schema explaining what just IS) I like. One is Robert Anton Wilson's book Cosmic Trigger and the emphasis that as they focused on something such as the number 23, or conspiracies etc., these "things" proliferated for those embracing the thoughts OF these "things".

Another is Vadim Zealand who talks of the "space of variations" which is EVERYTHING where each various state holds particular patterns. So in one pattern fractally exists a "kind" of energy with its representations.We can learn the technology of deliberately accessing all that goes along with the state. For instance the polarity of war and peace exists but we can inhabit either extreme at will WHEN we know how to slide form state to state.

Abraham Hicks has great information on how emotional tone is most important. So HAPPY presents a whole kind of different tone and precedes stuff that makes one happy. It IS most important in this model that we feel "good" then will see its appearance.

Neville Goddard talks of "thinking from the end", where we each create the revelation of our chosen state by feeling it real.

There are so many more examples given in various language. As far as "chaos magic" or any discipline, the only way to experience the fruits of the discipline is through DOING the work.

There are many various "reasons" that beings have for living in the earth realm. IMO no one is "wrong" in what is being explored and the new paradigm is less and less about what the collective MUST do because it is not in the crowd that one crafts ones reality. I can SEE in others the effect of adopting paradigms and acting them out. IMO we will less tied to collective expression and more free.

Like others, I cannot quite understand the news I see. I can get outraged by issues like wholesale cutting of forests. HOWEVER, I despite my lack of agreement, realize now that "mine is not theirs". I know that I will be surrounded by nature that includes trees, birds, insects and other creatures. I will continue to imagine health, wealth and happiness for everyone and EXPECT my own.

I just don't believe I can possibly know how the whole is moving towards "good" but I insist that Creator did not ever make junk and TELEOLOGY (the pull from the Creator's intention) fractally means my experience as free will of choosing a path is what I can know but not all there IS. It does not contradict IMO that the whole aims for a GIVEN intention beyond all particulars...it being the will of creation that life expand and renew and resolve and move and change.

Transmutation is IMO a general rule of matter...particular elements are fixed by pattern and can alter in pattern. I am responsible to transmute my own manure to fertilizer. Dedicated to the ideal that as as I transmute my energies and lift my perspective, I AM much more broad and clear in perceptions. Transmutation means I am not afraid of anything threatening as I can shift MY RELATIONSHIPS (it always takes two to tango hehe). Whatever I encounter appears not permanent but a state.

Feeling the PRESENCE is itself a sacred technology. Just connecting to source (by whatever Whatever WHATEVER called) can become the automatic transmuter IMO. I am much more able to feel connected to Presence and have power to act for my intentions knowing this is all that matters. This is emphasis on what leads to RESULTS requested rather than doctrines and creeds and influencing others and arguing intellectual positions with others

These videos are related in a way to practical sacred technology.
I have always known that sacred technology has many variations (not one size fits all and beings are NOT all the same) and one intention...deeper understanding of our essential being and purpose. IMO this can happen within a very pleasant scene.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/ukCHG3cm8Hs[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/EDlpKznIgMo[/youtube]

[youtube]https://youtu.be/JGcCCBU-wpU[/youtube]
Sandy Clark
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:38 am
Location: Saskatoon, Sk. Canada
Has thanked: 1610 times
Been thanked: 587 times

Re: Truth and understanding is forever the lovely, the good and the expanding

Post by Sandy Clark »

This is so right on Maggie...Have a lots of Chaos Magic going on right now.......happy to hear about your Thanksgiving week and all the apparent LOVE actions of maintenance with your Brother's talents, skills, care and concern...totally aweesome :-) :D

maggie wrote:This was the best Thanksgiving week EVER. I had a whole week visit from my brother whom I love dearly. He fixed things for me and was extravagant in gifts like gravel on the drive as a christmas present. Now I have a real driveway. I saw symbolic meaning in what he brought : more light (new outside and laundry room light fixtures), easier passage (the driveway). He was the hand in a magical way these luxuries appeared.

Magic is grabbing my attention BE CAUSE it seems to me that we have seen already how in this experience, the underlying principles are the important mastery. Magic is an art of change in accordance with will. What we will can as easily be for superficial or deep change IF we know that all the material world is just the expression of what is imagined. When commerce and politics and art and religion persuade us to imagine an importance in their products, we have THAT product. If we imagine what WE want and know is important BE CAUSE we decided, the elements form OUR choice. I would prefer my choice and my focus to manifest which IMO is using a whole technology that is practical.

"Like branding, Chaos Magic is mostly concerned with
inception. But where branding is about implanting ideas in the
brains of an audience, Chaos Magic is about implanting ideas
into your own."
Off Topic
K-HOLE #5
A REPORT ON DOUBT
“Seeing the future ≠ changing the future.”

CHAOS MAGI
The fundamental element of magic is the ability to manifest or
sublimate things, whether they’re emotions, states of being,
people, or the Statue of Liberty. Magic is the art of making
things appear or disappear, out of nowhere or into the void.
This magic, the lady-in-a-box, rabbit-in-a-hat form of magic,
is predicated on two questions: where did she go? And how
did we get here? When you’re a baby, things are constantly
appearing out of fucking nowhere and vanishing with no hope
of return, until at some point you learn pattern recognition.
But let’s not forget that on some level believing that the sun
will rise again is rooted in magical thinking.

“My ex-boyfriend used to tell me witches are real in Colombia
— because everyone believes in them.” Belief at an individual
level changes you, and belief at a collective level changes the
world. But if you believe something strongly enough, can you
morph the individual into the collective?

Over cheeseburgers and beer, a friend explained an idea we
were bound to ruin: Chaos Magic. On a bargain basement level,
Chaos Magic lives in the same realm as the cult of positive
thinking. But it goes beyond making mood boards of highend
apartments you’d like to will into your possession. Belief
becomes a technology that creates change.

CHAOS MAGIC
Chaos Magic creates realities which are temporary and
subjective. It’s not a tool for changing others — it’s a tool for
changing yourself. You opt into whatever belief system you
think will help you reach your intended goals: Wall Street’s
Confidence Fairy, your Fairy Godmother, or the Church of
Agape. Chaos Magic isn’t just believing in The Secret, it’s
deciding to believe in The Secret to begin with. Mixing your
own Kool-Aid, deciding how strong to make it, knowing when
to drink it and when to stop, is Chaos Magic in practice. It’s
radical DIY that uses reality as the only necessary operating
system. This is not to say that Kool-Aid will always take you on
the path you intended. Drink too much and you might end up
lost, alone, or dead.

LOST, ALONE,
OR DEAD

Chaos Magic is what happens after will. It’s the antidote to the
try hard problems that come with overthinking everything. If
you really want change you have to go deeper.
Like branding, Chaos Magic is mostly concerned with
inception. But where branding is about implanting ideas in the
brains of an audience, Chaos Magic is about implanting ideas
into your own. Both practices depend heavily on the creation of
sigils + mantras. There is a tight homology here:
SIGIL = LOGO
MANTRA = SLOGAN

One guide says for your magic to work, you should make a
sigil, forget about it, then stare at it at the moment of climax.
Fuck someone wearing Chanel, stare at the label while you’re
cumming, and you’ll become Karl Lagerfeld. Chaos Magic, like
branding, is desire doomed to be commercial.

CHAOS MAGIC
With respect to magic, our friends, Chronos, and God,
we’re going to try to avoid ruining the problem. The
fuzzy uncertainty that floats around the idea of magic
is more important than a slapdash explanation of how
magic works.

K-HOLE took a stab at answering a few questions: Do we
use magic? Do brands use magic? Does magic exist, or is
it just a placeholder for our ignorance? Are we hearing
voices, doing voices, or both? (get the pdf here http://khole.net/issues/05/)

CHAOS MAGIC
HACK YOUR
LIZARD
Off Topic
PARADIGM SHIFTS AND AEONICS
by Pete Carroll
All the philosophies, creeds, dogmas and beliefs that humanity has evolved are variants of three great paradigms, the Transcendental, the Materialist and the Magical. In no human culture has any one of these paradigms been completely distinct from the others. For example, in our own culture at the time of writing the Transcendental and Magical paradigms are frequently confused together.

Transcendental philosophies are basically religious and manifest in a spectrum stretching from the fringes of primitive spiritism through pagan polytheism to the monotheism of the Judaeo-Christian-Islamic traditions and the theoretical non-theistic systems of Buddhism and Taoism. In each case it is believed that some form of consciousness or spirit created and maintains the universe and that humans, other living organisms, contain some fragment of this consciousness or spirit which underlies the veil or illusion of matter. The essence of Transcendentalism is belief in spiritual beings greater than oneself or states of spiritual being superior to that which currently one enjoys. Earthly life is frequently seen merely as a form of dialogue between oneself and one's deity or deities, or perhaps some impersonal form of higher force. The material world is a theatre for the spirit or soul or consciousness that created it. Spirit is the ultimate reality to the transcendentalist.

In the Materialist paradigm the universe is believed to consist fundamentally and entirely of matter. Energy is but a form of matter and together they subtend space and time within which all change occurs strictly on the basis of cause and effect. Human behaviour is reducible to biology, biology is reducible to chemistry, chemistry is reducible to physics and physics is reducible to mathematics. Mind and consciousness are thus merely electrochemical events in the brain and spirit is a word without objective content. The causes of some events are likely to remain obscure perhaps indefinitely, but there is an underlying faith that sufficient material cause must exist for any event. All human acts can be categorized as serving some biological need or as expressions of previously applied conditioning or merely as malfunction. The goal of materialist who eschews suicide is the pursuit of personal satisfaction including altruistic satisfactions if desired.

The main difficulty in recognizing and describing the pure Magical Paradigm is that of insufficient vocabulary. Magical philosophy is only recently recovering from a heavy adulteration with transcendental theory. The word aether will be used to describe the fundamental reality of the magical paradigm. It is more or less equivalent to the idea of Mana used in oceanic shamanism. Aether in materialistic descriptions is information which structures matter and which all matter is capable of emitting and receiving. In transcendental terms aether is a sort of “life force” present in some degree in all things. It carries both knowledge about events and the ability to influence similar or sympathetic events. Events either arise spontaneously out of themselves or are encouraged to follow certain paths by influence of patterns in the aether. As all things have an aetheric part they can be considered to be alive in some sense. Thus all things happen by magic, the large scale features of the universe have a very strong aetheric pattern which makes them fairly predictable but difficult to influence by the aetheric patterns created by thought. Magicians see themselves as participating in nature. Transcendentalists like to think they are somehow above it. Materialists like to try and manipulate it.

Now this universe has the peculiarly accommodating property of tending to provide evidence for, and confirmation of, whatever paradigm one chooses to believe in. Presumably at some deep level there is a hidden symmetry between those things we call Matter, Aether and Spirit. Indeed, it is rare to find an individual or culture operating exclusively on a single one of these paradigms and none is ever entirely absent. Non dominant paradigms are always present as superstitions and fears. A subsequent section on Aeonics will attempt to untangle the influences of each of these great world views throughout history, to see how they have interacted with each other and to predict future trends. In the meantime an analysis of the radically differing concepts of time and self in each paradigm is offered to more fully distinguish the basic ideas.

Transcendentalists conceive of time in millennial and apocalyptic terms. Time is regarded as having a definite beginning and ending, both initiated by the activities of spiritual beings or forces. The end of time on the personal and cosmic scale is regarded not so much as a cessation of being but as a change to a state of non material being. The beginning of personal and cosmic time is similarly regarded as a creative act by spiritual agencies. Thus reproductive activity usually becomes heavily controlled and hedged about with taboo and restriction in religious cultures, as it implies an usurpation of the powers of deities. Reproduction also implies that death has in some measure been overcome. How awesome the power of creation and how final must earthly death subconsciously loom to a celibate and sterile priesthood.

All transcendentalisms embody elements of apocalypticism. Typically these are used to provoke revivals when business is slack or attention is drifting elsewhere. Thus it is suddenly revealed that the final days are at hand or that some earthly dispute is in fact a titanic battle against evil spiritual agencies.

Materialist time is linear but unbounded. Ideally it can be extended arbitrarily far in either direction from the present. To the strict materialist it is self-evidently futile to speculate about a beginning or an end to time. Similarly the materialist is contemptuous of any speculations about any forms of personal existence before birth or after death. The materialist may well fear painful or premature death but can have no fears about being dead.

The magical view is that time is cyclic and that all processes recur. Even cycles which appear to begin or end are actually parts of larger cycles. Thus all endings are beginnings and the end of time is synonymous with the beginning of time in another universe. The magical view that everything is recycled is reflected in the doctrine of reincarnation. The attractive idea of reincarnation has often persisted into the religious paradigm and many pagan and even some monotheist traditions have retained it. However religious theories invariably contaminate the original idea with beliefs about a personal soul. From a strictly magical viewpoint we are an accretion rather than an unfolded unity. The psyche has no particular centre, we are colonial beings, a rich collage of many selves. Thus as our bodies contain fragments from countless former beings, so does our psyche. However certain magical traditions retain techniques which allow the adept to transfer quite large amounts of his psyche in one piece should he consider this more useful than dispersing himself into humanity at large.

Each of the paradigms take a different view of the self. Transcendentalists view self as spirit inserted into matter. As a fragment or figment of deity the self regards itself as somehow placed in the world in a non arbitrary manner and endowed with free will. The transcendental view of self is relatively stable and non-problematic if shared as a consensus with all significant others. However, transcendental theories about the placement and purpose of self and its relationship to deities are mutually exclusive. Conflicting transcendentalisms can rarely co-exist for they threaten to disconform the images of self. Encounters which are not decisive tend to be mutually negatory in the long run.

Of the three views of self the purely materialistic one is the most problematical. If mind is an extension of matter it must obey material laws and the resulting deterministic view conflicts with the subjective experience of free will. On the other hand, if mind and consciousness are assumed to be qualitatively different from matter then the self is incomprehensible to itself in material terms. Worse still perhaps, the materialist self must regard itself as a phenomenon of only temporary duration in contradiction of the subjective expectation of continuity of consciousness. Because a purely materialist view of self is so austere few are prepared to confront such naked existentialism. Consequently materialist cultures exhibit a frantic appetite for sensation, identification and more or less disposable irrational beliefs. Anything that will make the self seem less insubstantial.

The magical view of self is that it is based on the same random capricious chaos which makes the universe exist and do what it does. The magical self has no centre, it is not a unity but an assemblage of parts, any number of which may temporarily club together and call themselves “I”. This accords with the observation that our subjective experience consists of our various selves experiencing each other. Free will arises either as an outcome of a dispute between our various selves or as a sudden random creation of a new idea or option. In the magical view of self there is no spirit/matter or mind/body split and the paradoxes of free will and determinism disappear. Some of our acts arise from random choices between conditioned options and some from conditional choices between randomly created options. In practice most of our acts are based on rather complex hierarchical sequences of all four of these mechanisms. As soon as we have acted one of our selves proclaims “I did that!” so loudly that most of the other selves think they did it too.

Each of the three views of self has something derogatory to say about the other two. From the standpoint of the transcendental self the materialist self has become prey to pride of intellect, the demon hubris, whilst the magical view of self is considered to be entirely demonic. The material self views the transcendentalist as obsessed with assumptions having no basis in fact, and the magical self as being childlike and incoherent. From the standpoint of the magical view, the assorted selves of the transcendentalist have ascribed a grossly exaggerated importance to one or a few of the selves which they call God or gods, whilst the materialist has attempted to make all his selves subordinate to the self that does the rational thinking. Ultimately it's a matter of faith and taste.

The transcendentalist has faith in his god self, the materialist has faith in his reasoning self and the selves of the magician have faith in each other. Naturally, all these forms of faith are subject to periods of doubt.

Last modified: 2017/01/14 17:35by John Bell
https://hermetic.com/chaos/paradigm-shifts-and-aeonics
Off Topic
My Years of Magical Thinking, by Lionel Snell https://www.amazon.co.uk/Years-Magical- ... 0904311244

Lionel Snell is without doubt one of the great magical thinkers of the last half-century. This book is somewhat different to his other books, because he is offering his arguments to the wider public beyond the magical ghetto. It is a concerted defence of magical thinking - but as one of four basic types of thinking, four basic human ways of apprehending our worlds.

This four-directions model is not new - Snell's first book, SSOTBME, from 1974, laid out this model of human apprehension, but I must confess I never got that it was supposed to be a normal mode of thinking; somehow I assumed he was smuggling it in to complete his picture, and that it was still a fringe thing. Thinking back, I am puzzled at how I misread that idea, but it no doubt has to do with the fact that my own approach to magical thinking has often emphasized the fringe-y, even freakish nature of such thinking - the freakiness of which I am quite comfortable with.

Snell is careful to explain that this is not a map of 4 quadrants, into which all thinking can be neatly stuffed, but a compass of 4 directions, tendencies. These tendencies do have at their core some ideal kind of thinking which is of course always referred to, often emulated but never achieved in a pure form. He points out that this model is in itself an example of magical thinking, and is aware of the price we pay for making systems:
'No theory can claim maturity until it has been accused of being "a gross over-simplification".'

So what are the characteristics of the 4 types of thinking?

Magical thinking is based on a combination of feeling and sensation - we gather evidence directly via sensation and then decide how to act by what 'feels right.'
This is a fast mode of processing, much faster than Scientific thinking's combination of sensation and thinking. So it is much more useful in a pinch. I was reminded of the words of one of my favourite songwriters, Arthur Lee, when he sings: 'I believe in magic / Why? Because it is so quick / I don't need power when I'm hypnotized...'

Here is an elegant indicator of Religious thinking:
'...a notion has no religious meaning unless it is capable of being disbelieved (for otherwise there would be no non-believers from which the believers could differentiate themselves).'

Magical thinking is characterized by an inclusiveness of thought:
'In magical culture, a belief in any one system does not compel disbelief in another system that contradicts it, and this sets magical thinking apart from religious or scientific use of the word "belief`".'

For example:
'...I clearly accept the theory of evolution as a myth. I accept the myth that consciousness is generated within my brain, because that too works well for me - but it does not stop me also accepting the myth that I have an immortal soul that has incarnated in this body because that also works well in other contexts. I can at the same time accept the myth that light is a wave as well as the myth that light is made of particles, as both those myths work for me in their own way.'

Magical thinking also involves a game-like approach to life, not taking belief in what you are doing too seriously. The edges of magic, perhaps on the Science side of the compass, show up where:
'You do find magicians apparently so serious about a particular set of symbols that they appear to have accepted it as "absolutely true". Does that mean they are no longer playing a game?'

In contrast, the attitude of the official game-playing world of sport is much more serious, and Lionel puts it under Religious thinking, in which we have to believe in one thing and exclude all others, belong to one in-group and relegate all other people to the out-group.

The edges of Scientific thinking are interesting. Snell shows how theoretical physics is Platonism, of a peculiar kind:
'For example, any experiment as experienced subjectively by a scientist must be assumed to have a one-to-one relationship with an experiment taking place in the higher Platonic reality of a physical universe that is assumed to "really exist" and whose shadow or image makes up the experimenter's subjective experience.'

Plato, as I read him, is talking about subjectivity, and therefore the ideal states he talks about are subjective ones, and our discrimination around them is what leads us to spiritual awakening. But in our post-Cartesian world, spirit and even consciousness is rejected as being too difficult to understand, so theoreticians like Dennett and Dawkins pretend it doesn't exist (the most ridiculous philosophical position imaginable, since consciousness is the only prime datum we have). So instead physicists have projected an ideal out onto the external world, of an objective existence behind what we experience but which we can never reach.

The final section addresses some issue in the modern world. Snell tells us we are living in a culture where magical thinking is once again rising to prominence. This is of course not all good - it is the sort of era when some pundit in all seriousness can coin the phrase 'post-truth', a world in which prominent figures are not even shamed when their lies are revealed. http://chaotopia-dave.blogspot.com/2017 ... ionel.html
Post Reply

Return to “Science (Spirituality)”