Wikipedia Naysayers
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:53 am
Ive noticed on many Wikipedia pages dealing with sensitive topics, such as "psychic detectives", for example, theres a fuck ton of failures cited but no successes.
The internet kind of blows (on wikipedia) because of dynamic censorship.
There are thousands of examples of psychic ability aiding investigations & private inquiries (in books).
When you are at thrift stores and whatnot a good thing to do is snag books documentinfs ESP etc as wikipedia and other information sources are deleting, editing, censoring, minimizing the very real as historically significant role of ESP.
The internet kind of blows (on wikipedia) because of dynamic censorship.
There are thousands of examples of psychic ability aiding investigations & private inquiries (in books).
When you are at thrift stores and whatnot a good thing to do is snag books documentinfs ESP etc as wikipedia and other information sources are deleting, editing, censoring, minimizing the very real as historically significant role of ESP.