A Cosmic Quandary: NASA Admits Astronauts Risk Cognitive Damage
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:50 am
A few years back, maybe in 2012, on my blog nuclearnuttery, there was an article in response to a CNN article regarding ionizing radiation and NASA astronauts returning in various states of brain damage.
They apparently just ran another one:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/health/ma ... in-damage/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Now, I guess one of my questions is, what are the comparative rates of degeneration between the brains of men and women, and how the temporary removal of iron and fluoride from the diet may affect this.
There are quite a few ways to redirect energy that they may not be considering actively.

The womb for instance. The point of the water isn't just to counteract gravity. It's to slow down ionizing radiation. So theoretically if the habitat was encased in fluid or an energy field that mimics fluid, part of the problem will be solved.

And didn't they recently say that certain strong magnetic fields can redirect local radiation?
Much love and concern for our astronauts,
NF
They apparently just ran another one:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/health/ma ... in-damage/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Now, I guess one of my questions is, what are the comparative rates of degeneration between the brains of men and women, and how the temporary removal of iron and fluoride from the diet may affect this.
There are quite a few ways to redirect energy that they may not be considering actively.
The womb for instance. The point of the water isn't just to counteract gravity. It's to slow down ionizing radiation. So theoretically if the habitat was encased in fluid or an energy field that mimics fluid, part of the problem will be solved.
And didn't they recently say that certain strong magnetic fields can redirect local radiation?
Much love and concern for our astronauts,
NF