The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

“The smallest act of kindness is worth more than the greatest intention.”
― Kahlil Gibran
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »


The United States Department of Justice
Eastern District of New York

U.S. Attorneys » Eastern District of New York » News

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of New York
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Drug Trafficker Who Ran Cocaine Importation Scheme Out Of His Family’s Queens-Based Restaurant Receives 18-Year Prison Sentence

Gregorio Gigliotti’s Sentence Follows his Conviction at Trial for Importing More Than 50 Kilograms of Cocaine into the U.S from Costa Rica in Shipments of Produce



Earlier today, United States District Judge Raymond J. Dearie sentenced the defendant Gregorio Gigliotti to 18 years in prison for narcotics-trafficking and firearms-related offenses.

The sentence was announced by Bridget M. Rohde, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; William F. Sweeney, Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI); and Angel M. Melendez, Special-Agent-in-Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), New York.

Following a two-week trial in July 2016, a federal jury in Brooklyn, New York found the defendant Gregorio Gigliotti and his son, Angelo Gigliotti, guilty of participating in a long-running cocaine importation scheme. The jury also found the defendant guilty of unlawfully possessing firearms – including a defaced firearm – in furtherance of the drug-trafficking operation. The defendant’s wife, Eleonora Gigliotti, also participated in the family-run drug-trafficking operation, and in January 2017, pled guilty to conspiring to import cocaine. Angelo Gigliotti and Eleonora Gigliotti are awaiting sentencing, and face mandatory minimum sentences of 20 years and 5 years, respectively.

The defendants’ arrests arose out of a long-term investigation by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), in coordination with law enforcement authorities in Italy, into a transnational cocaine trafficking operation. Between October and December 2014, federal law enforcement officers intercepted and seized approximately 55 kilograms of cocaine that had been hidden inside cardboard boxes that contained cassava and sent from co-conspirators in Costa Rica to the defendants in New York. To facilitate their operation, the defendants used their family-run Italian restaurant in Corona, Queens, Cucino Amodo Mio, as well as a produce importation company, Fresh Farm Export Corp., that was incorporated in 2012 to provide a cover for their drug-trafficking operation. On March 11, 2015, the day the defendants were arrested, federal law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Cucino Amodo Mio and recovered one 12 gauge shotgun; one loaded .357 magnum Trooper revolver; one loaded .22 caliber Colt pistol; one loaded .38 caliber Charter Arms revolver; one 9 mm Keltec pistol; one .762 Czech pistol; one .38 caliber Derringer that had a defaced serial number; ammunition magazines; loose ammunition; two handgun holsters; brass knuckles; a handwritten ledger showing the movement of more than $350,000; and more than $100,000 in cash.

The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Organized Crime & Gangs Section. Assistant United States Attorneys Margaret E. Gandy and Keith D. Edelman are in charge of the prosecution..

The Defendants:

GREGORIO GIGLIOTTI
Age: 61
Malba, New York

E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 15-CR-204 (S-2) (RJD)
USAO - New York, Eastern
Topic:
Drug Trafficking
Firearms Offenses
Project Safe Neighborhoods
Updated April 18, 2017
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »

Check this out :


Stigmatized property

In real estate, stigmatized property is property which buyers or tenants may shun for reasons that are unrelated to its physical condition or features.[1]

These can include death of an occupant,[1][2] murder,[1][2] suicide,[2] serious illness such as AIDS,[1][2] and belief that a house is haunted.[3]

Controversy exists regarding the definitions of stigma and what sorts of stigma must be disclosed at sale, with local jurisdictions varying widely in their interpretation of these issues.

It is argued that the seller has a duty to disclose any such history of the property. This, in practice, falls into two categories: demonstrable (physical) as well as emotional. These guidelines vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Types of stigma

Many jurisdictions recognize several forms of stigmatized property, and have passed resolutions or statutes to deal with them. One issue that separates them is disclosure. Depending on the jurisdiction of the house, the seller may not be required to disclose the full facts. Some specific types must always be disclosed, others are up to the jurisdiction, and still others up to the realtor.[3]

The types include:

Criminal stigma: the property was used in the ongoing commission of a crime. For example, a house is stigmatized if it has been used as a brothel, chop shop, or drug den. In the case of drug dens, some drug addicts may inadvertently come to the address expecting to purchase illegal drugs. Most jurisdictions require full disclosure of this sort of element.[3]

Debt stigma: Debt collectors unaware that a debtor has moved out of a particular residence may continue their pursuit at the same location, resulting in harassment of innocent subsequent occupiers. This is particularly pronounced if the collection agency uses aggressive or illegal tactics.[3]

Minimal stigma is known to, or taken seriously by, only a small select group, and such a stigma is unlikely to affect the ability to sell the property; in such a case, realtors may decide to disclose this information in a case-by-case basis.[4]

Murder/suicide stigma: Some jurisdictions in the United States require property sellers to reveal if murder or suicide occurred on the premises. California state law does if the event occurred within the previous three years. To protect sellers from lawsuits, Florida state law does not require any notification.[2] In North Carolina, sellers and agents do not have to volunteer information about the death of previous occupants, but a direct question must be answered truthfully.[1]

Phenomena stigma: Many (but not all) jurisdictions require disclosure if a house is renowned for "haunting", ghost sightings, etc. This is in a separate category from public stigma, wherein the knowledge of "haunting" is restricted to a local market.[3]

Public stigma : when the stigma is known to a wide selection of the population and any reasonable person can be expected to know of it. Examples include the Amityville Horror house and the home of the Menendez brothers. Public stigma must always be disclosed, in almost all American and European jurisdictions.[3]
Legal status

At least in the United States, the principle of caveat emptor ("let the buyer beware") was held for many years to govern sales. As the idea of an implied warranty of habitability began to find purchase, however, issues like the stigma attached to a property based on acts, "haunting", or criminal activity began to make their way into legal precedents.[5]

In Stambovsky v. Ackley the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, affirmed a narrow interpretation of the idea of stigmatized property. The court held that since the property in question was previously marketed by the seller as a "haunted house" he was estopped from claiming the contrary. The majority opinion specifically noted that the veracity of the claims of paranormal activities were outside the purview of the opinion.

Notwithstanding these conclusions, the court affirmed the dismissal of the fraudulent misrepresentation action and stated that the realtor was under no duty to disclose the haunting to potential buyers. Several states have created specific statutes in the US adding "stigmatised property" verbiage to their legal code.
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »

Right after posting this, i heard one of my fgt drug ring neighbors invite a friend in just to smoke heroin.

Lol

They were talking about a friend who told said guy he couldn't smoke at some third location.. sigh lol

Anyway regarding stigmatized property.
In February the superior court selected a jury in regards to a drug house they were repossessing & paying off the offending retard (prior owner).

I was interviewed with many others but not selected, as i was way too invested in the public interest, to sit on this jury as "impartial".

After telling the court about drug lords who buy (stigmatized) property such as my current house perhaps, I did notice that my landlord started treating me differently, like a bomb he'd discovered in his front yard or something.

Then the next month I was jumped by the 2 little Florencia-13 fucks, less than a few blocks from home.

I really do think that this criminal asshat is acquiring stigmatized property & populating it with nasty drug dealing renters in order to get more money.

Neighbor sprayed Raid and left the house again this afternoon shortly before I wrote this.

It's hard not to envision all of them in a bonfire together.
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »

:(

http://realtytimes.com/consumeradvice/h ... tamination" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are You Obligated to Disclose Previous Meth Contamination on Your Property?
WRITTEN BY ELIZABETH WHITED POSTED ON MONDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2013 19:03

Meth labs have been found in some pretty strange places. To name a few: college campuses, hotel rooms, vehicles, and even inside a nursing home. But the most common, and logical (if setting up a meth lab anywhere could be considered logical) place is in a rental property, or home. After all of the cleanup, and the extensive procedures to take care of a previous meth lab on a property, is it still necessary to inform new renters, or potential buyers?

The answer, of course depends on the state. The Scripps Howard News Service conducted a searchfor states that require meth contamination disclosure to potential home buyers, and tenants. They found that only a little over half of the states in America require disclosure (with varying laws).

Real estate agents and home owners in Washington, Oregon, California, Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, South Dakota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois, Arkansas, Louisiana, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, West Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Alaska, or Hawaii, are obligated to disclose meth contamination in a home for sale. Some states require written notices, some require no disclosure if the site has been properly cleaned and treated, while others allow disclosures to be undone, once the site is off of the state’s contamination list.

Even fewer states require disclosure for rental properties or units. Property managers and leasing agents in Washington, Oregon, California, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, South Dakota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, and New Hampshire need to disclose the creation of methamphetamines in the unit. In Arizona, it is even illegal for anyone other than the owner to enter the unit, until it has been cleaned in accordance with the law (Scripps Howard).

If a rental unit is suspected of housing a meth lab, it needs to be inspected by professionals. The hazardous toxins and chemicals need to be cleaned and treated, as the side effects on humans, and especially children can be disastrous. Not to mention, the explosive tendencies of the chemicals themselves. The website http://www.methlabhomes.comupdates" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; property owners on meth contamination cleanup news.

Now would be a good time to make sure all property management staff have been trained in identifying classic meth lab red flags, since as Breaking Bad has taught us - it can happen anywhere, by anyone.

Source: http://media2.scrippsnationalnews.com/meth/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

About the Author: Elizabeth Whited is the Operations Coordinator at the Rent Rite Directory. She has written educational articles for multifamily magazines and Real Estate websites to help Property Managers and Owners improve their properties, in an effort to reduce crime in their communities. The Rent Rite Directory educates Property Managers and Owners at Crime Watch Meetings, and Crime Free Association Conferences, and works closely with law enforcement nationwide. For more information, visit http://www.therrd.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »

My landlord seems to accept Only tenants with active drug problem. This piece of shit needs exposed.

He's not some innocent fucking Robin Hood, he's just better at beating dead horses, ie people dying of aids and people fucked up by heroin, ie people with no expectation of quality of life, to minimize the landlord's chance of being prosecuted.

He's such a good helper, shepherding the little lemmings off the cliff.
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »


CONVICTED DRUG DEALER ALSO DID REAL ESTATE DEALS
0 Comments for this article
By: Brian Didlake Submitted: 12/23/2016 - 9:23pm
Tags: Elgin DeMarco Jordan

ATLANTA (AP) – When the suspected head of a major Atlanta-area drug-trafficking organization had money to spare, the 42-year-old often did what other amateur investors, venture capitalists and businessmen do: He snapped up blighted real estate in the city’s struggling neighborhoods.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports Elgin DeMarco Jordan’s criminal prosecution for drug dealing has helped lift the veil on how a single owner can impact a community.

Jordan and his associates bought up much of a pocket of the struggling Grove Park neighborhood, where he spent most of his life, plus a half-dozen other properties scattered across the city’s poorer areas.

The real estate was seized as part of a multi-agency effort to halt drug sales in “The Bluff,” known as a hub of the Southeast’s heroin trade. Jordan forfeited most of them when he was sentenced to eight years in federal prison for drug and money laundering charges.

___

Information from: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, http://www.ajc.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

What is the Relationship Between Drug Activity and Real Estate?
Many states have additional drug laws that prohibit certain drug activities in connection with real estate, and they are generally referred to as Disorderly House Laws, or Drug House Laws.

What is Considered Drug Activity?
Drug activity is a broad category, but most states define it as doing any of the following with a controlled substance:

Keeping,
Using,
Selling,
Distributing, or
Manufacturing.
Controlled substances can range from narcotics like marijuana, cocaine, and heroin to industrial chemicals like mercury or benzene.

What Level of Connection do I Have to Have With Real Estate to be Guilty?
Most states only make it a crime to be in control or management of real estate where drug activity is occurring. In deciding if you control or manage the real estate, a court will consider things like:

The time you have spent at the real estate,
How you acquired the real estate,
If you are renting or owning the real estate,
How much repairs you have put into the real estate, and
If you supply food to the residents of the real estate.
What are the Consequences for Drug Activity in Connection to Real Estate?
If you violate a Disorderly House Law or a Drug House Law, you have generally committed a felony and could face punishments that include:

Jail time, ranging from 2 to 10 years,
Fines, ranging from $1,000 to $1,000,000,
Community service, usually no less than 30 days, or
Condemnation of the real estate.
You may also be found guilty of other drug crimes depending on the drug activity you are involved in.

Do I Need an Attorney if I am Charged With Drug Activity in Relation to Real Estate?
It is highly recommended that you contact a criminal defense attorney if you are charged with violating a Disorderly Home Law or a Drug Home Law because of the severity of the crime and only an attorney will be able to properly defend you.

- See more at: http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/a ... nwYtJ.dpuf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
User avatar
Naga_Fireball
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:22 pm
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1751 times
Been thanked: 1566 times

Re: The Walla Walla Gold Rush 2017 (Druglord Landlord, lol)

Post by Naga_Fireball »


http://m.chicagoreader.com/chicago/how- ... oid=875133" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

How to get rid of the local drug dealer
by Dan Liberty

February 01, 1990
Facebook

63 comments
Suppose for a moment you live next door to a drug house. Cars queue up in your street. Drug abusers loiter in front of your house or apartment. Gunfire occasionally disturbs your sleep, and in the morning you might find derelicts sleeping it off in your front yard. Whether you're a yuppie rehabber, downwardly mobile artist, aging home owner, white ethnic, Hispanic, Asian, or African American, you're in danger the moment you step out your door and you know it.

Suppose you try to fight back. You call the police, detailing your knowledge of your neighbor's illicit enterprise. Now what? Do you expect them to surveil the building, confirm your suspicions, raid the drug dealer's home, and make your neighborhood safe again for decent citizens?

You might expect that, but it probably won't happen. Why not?

Well, your first call most likely would be meaningless. If you called 911, they'd say it wasn't an emergency. If you called your local police station, they probably wouldn't have the manpower to seriously pursue your information. Most squad cars on the street are "radio police," meaning they respond only to the 911 dispatcher. Not even their district commander can pull them off 911 duty to check into your complaint.

Even if you get past these initial frustrations, you're going to have a hard time closing down your neighborhood dope house. Let's say you and a group of like-minded neighbors are able to get a meeting with your local police commander, and he promises to check out your complaint. In practice, this often means uniformed police will cruise down your street, stopping some of the likely offenders for a not-so-friendly chat. If they can't scare the bad guys away, and you keep complaining, they might stage a bust. And that will usually slow up a well-organized drug dealer for a couple of days at most. In the event that one of the bad guys is sent to jail for a long time--keep in mind that this requires three busts involving certain well-known quantities of drugs--one of the drug dealer's associates will usually take over the store. By then, your block will have deteriorated for quite a few years.

The 1700 block of West Superior was once disfigured by an extremely active drug house. Then, a few years ago, organizer Pepe Frau stepped in. (At the time, Frau worked for the Chicago Alliance for Neighborhood Safety.) He itched to try something new against the drug dealers, but the Superior Street block club elected to stay with conventional measures: they worked painstakingly through every step of the scenario above. That took about two years.

When those efforts ultimately proved futile, Frau got his chance. First the block club went to court to ask judges to make it a condition of a neighborhood dope dealer's probation that, unless he lived there, he not be allowed back on the block. The block club had discovered that breaking probation is an administrative offense, and therefore the standards of evidence in determining a violation were less strict than if it had been a criminal offense. To have the offender locked up all they needed was a "preponderance of evidence" that the terms of probation had been violated. It sounded slick enough to be a good plan.

"Sure enough," said Frau, "a guy gets out, and is seen almost immediately on the same block. Somebody calls us, we call police. But the police wouldn't enforce [the conditions of probation] because they don't know nothing about it. 'Let the courts enforce that,' they say." That was the end of that new tactic in the domestic war on drugs.

Around this time, David del Valle, an organizer with the Northwest Community Organization (NCO), was working less than two miles away from the Superior Street drug house with other groups of neighbors frustrated by the flagrant sale of narcotics on their blocks. He, too, had gone the conventional route, talking to police commanders, feeling encouraged by an initial spate of arrests, and ultimately realizing that nothing much had changed. Like Pepe Frau, he longed to try something different.

Del Valle took a seemingly conventional approach: he formed a committee, Citizens United for Safety (CUFS), drawn from four block clubs, including the one on Superior Street. The committee decided to study the whole network of law enforcement: the local police station, the state's attorney's office, the central police department's assets-forfeiture unit, the corporation counsel, and the city's departments of housing and inspectional services (the latter two have roles in shuttering buildings that house unlawful activities or present a public nuisance). Del Valle interviewed representatives of each agency, emerging with a thorough knowledge of each agency's relationship to the others. It was slow work.

"OK," del Valle's NCO director said to him one day, "but where's this leading to?" Del Valle admitted that he didn't know yet.

That's when he got the idea to diagram the lines of communication between agencies. He connected them by solid lines if they had good communication, dotted lines if they didn't. "There weren't too many solid lines," he said.

That realization led to the CUFS task force, which brought together representatives from each of the public agencies and some of the CUFS committee members. "We went to the agencies and asked if they'd be willing to try something a little different, and they said they would," said del Valle.

At the first meeting of the CUFS task force, a wondrous thing occurred. Dotted lines were made solid. The state's attorney, for instance, said he'd like to go after the owners of drug houses under nuisance-abatement laws, but his staff didn't have time to do the title searches. No problem. It turned out the Department of Inspectional Services (DIS) had them on computer. All the state's attorney had to do was call; they'd punch in the address and the owner's name would pop out.

After a few more meetings, the task-force plan was complete. CUFS would inform the police and their local alderman of the existence of a drug house. The alderman would write the owner (name provided by DIS) and ask for a meeting to discuss the problem. If the owner didn't respond, the alderman would contact the police to see if the owner's name appeared on its list of suspected narcotics dealers. If so, the police would call in the central police department's assets-forfeiture unit, which seizes property suspected of being involved in illegal activity. If not, David King, supervisor of the state's attorney's narcotics unit, would call in the owner to pointedly explain Illinois laws on nuisance abatement and the unlawful use of buildings, including the unhappy implication for the owner of assets forfeiture, and the willingness of the grand jury, this being America and all, to hear the owner's side of the story before considering an indictment. The hope was that the landlord would throw out the drug-dealing tenants--or, if the landlord was the dope dealer, cease operating out of the building--in order to preserve the property.

It seems to have worked. Of ten buildings targeted by the CUFS task force, police records and investigatory information indicate that drug activity has ceased in seven as a result of the CUFS approach. In another, drug activity was halted through more conventional means. In still another, the drug dealer had a fire in her building, ran outside stuffing drugs under her coat, and was busted by police on the fire scene. Though she's not currently in custody, "she probably figured her luck at the address had gone bad," one 14th District tactical unit lieutenant observed. In any event, she is believed to have ceased operations in the area. In the last of the ten buildings, the dealer has so far outfoxed police by rotating his operation among several buildings owned by relatives in the neighborhood.

The CUFS plan is not a silver bullet for the local drug war, however. True, the 1700 block of Superior has been cleaned up--"They can sit out on their stoops now; they couldn't do that before," said Frau. But neighbors on adjoining streets have seen the same drug dealers move onto their blocks. And the CUFS plan doesn't work with the corner drug dealer, who has nothing to fear from the twin hammers of assets forfeiture and nuisance abatement.

After a few months of internal reorganizing--Frau has joined NCO and taken over CUFS, while del Valle remains at NCO but has moved on to other issues--CUFS is studying the results of its first effort and looking for new ways to confront drug dealers of all kinds. While it is difficult for either the police or CUFS to say with certainty exactly what is going on in the ten targeted buildings, CUFS is not convinced that the sale of drugs has stopped in some of them. Another problem is that only one of the ten (the Superior Street house) was on CUFS's original list of dope houses. To get the CUFS plan in motion, the task force agreed to use the Police Department's list of dope houses rather than go after the ones that have been disturbing the lives of the CUFS committee members.

Still, all concerned hope to expand the success of the CUFS plan. Assistant state's attorney David King believes it can work. "When you see owners putting up For Rent signs [looking for legitimate tenants], you can see the results," he said. He is now seeking Cook County Board funding to hire six assistant state's attorneys and a contingent of investigative and administrative personnel to implement a CUFS-style program countywide. Knowing that money is tight at the Cook County Board (and mindful, perhaps, that not much is likely to happen during the current political season), King has asked the Illinois Criminal Justice Authority, which distributes federal moneys for law enforcement, for a grant to hire the new attorneys and staff.

Meanwhile CUFS would like to expand its base of operations and is looking for other interested citizens, community groups, and block clubs.
Brotherhood falls asunder at the touch of fire!
He finds his fellow guilty of a skin
Not coloured like his own, and having power
To enforce the wrong, for such a worthy cause
Dooms and devotes him as his lawful prey.
~William Cowper
Post Reply

Return to “Calls to Action”