Thank you for pointing that out Spiritwind. Since my debate with Amzer Zo (Hervé), the Project's in-house geology "expert", was an exercise-in-futility (the debate was a set-up from the start - my suspicion), allow me to try and set the record straight, here within this thread.Spiritwind wrote: [....snip]
"I noticed that you were posting about Yellowstone when the axe came down."
[....snip]
[link to final comment at the Project: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthr ... ost1062792" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]
This goes to the dishonesty of how one's character is assassinated at the Project:
Regardless of how I offered definitive evidence for a genuine concern relating to Yellowstone, every logical argument was countered by Hervé with confusing replies, and unrelated data - all of which were thanked by the other pundits of the cult - even replied to.
Every attempt was made to incite me into a knee-jerk reaction, which they knew how I would respond.
- *The evidence supports a westward movement of the North American Plate.
*The evidence supports a Yellowstone hotspot trail extending eastward over a 16 million + year period - thus confirming the westward movement of the North American Plate.
*The evidence supports the fact that the Yellowstone Hotspot, extends far into the deepest recesses of the mantle, and has (over millennia) boiled-through the subsiding Juan de Fuca microplate.
*The evidence supports the substance in the chambers located under Yellowstone is called "magma".
*The contested definition of the word Magma [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma] includes all the aspects of Hervé's pointless debate, rendering all he said on that issue moot.
The flak is always heaviest, directly over the target!
Thank you Spiritwind, for giving me the podium, so that I could clear that up....