Something is Affecting the Entire Solar System – Sun’s Magnetic Field 230% Stronger

[Spiritwind]

http://humansarefree.com/2015/07/someth ... solar.html

Something is Affecting the Entire Solar System – Sun’s Magnetic Field 230% Stronger

Strange things are happening in both outer and inner space. Scientists are discovering that the Solar System, the sun, and life itself are mutating in totally unprecedented ways.

They are reporting changes that are being recorded in space that have never been seen before. Studies show that the Sun and the planets themselves are physically changing at an accelerated pace. Most notably, they are undergoing major changes in their atmospheres.

Sun: The Sun is the center of our Solar System, and all life that is on this Earth came from the Sun. If there were no Sun, we would not be alive. This is simply scientific fact. And so any changes that occur in or on the Sun will eventually affect every person alive.

We know that the Sun’s magnetic field has changed in the last 100 years. There’s a study by Dr. Mike Lockwood from Rutherford Appleton National Laboratories, in California.

Dr. Lockwood has been investigating the Sun, and reports that since 1901 the overall magnetic field of the Sun has become stronger by 230 percent.

Moon: Earth’s moon is growing an atmosphere . Around the moon, there is this 6,000- kilometer- deep layer of Natrium that wasn’t there before.

Mercury: Unexpected polar ice discovered, along with a surprisingly strong intrinsic magnetic field.

Venus: 2500% increase in auroral brightness, and substantive global atmospheric changes in less than 40 years.

Mars: “Global Warming,” huge storms, disappearance of polar icecaps.

Jupiter: Over 200% increase in brightness of surrounding plasma clouds.(Huge belts in the giant planet’s atmosphere have changed color, radiation hotspots have faded and flared up again, and cloud levels have thickened and dissolved, all while space rocks have been hurtling into it the gas giant.)

Saturn: Major decrease in equatorial jet stream velocities in only 30 years, accompanied by surprising surge of X-rays from equator.

Uranus: Big changes in brightness, increased global cloud activity (This planet used to have a very calm atmosphere. )

Neptune: 40% increase in atmospheric brightness.

Pluto: 300% increase in atmospheric pressure, even as Pluto recedes farther from the Sun.

Earth: Substantial and obvious world-wide weather and geophysical changes. Earth’s Axis has changed. On Earth, the overall volcanic activity increased 500 percent from 1875 to 1975, while the earthquake activity has increased by 400 percent since 1973.

Dr. Dmitriev says that comparing the years 1963 to 1993, the overall number of natural disasters — hurricanes, typhoons, mud slides, tidal waves, etc. — has increased by 410 percent.

The Earth’s magnetic field has been decreasing. This decrease actually began 2000 years ago, but the rate of decrease suddenly became much more rapid 500 years ago. Now, in the last 20 years or so, the magnetic field has become erratic.

[Naga_Fireball]

You know, it's not that strange to believe.
Very interesting topic!

On the former site there was a thread about Betelgeuse apparently shrinking.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn ... king-star/

Well, perhaps when stars like our sun pass through less dense clouds of normal gas,
it does contribute energy to our system, and eventually mass;

would it be terribly hard to believe that somewhere near Betelgeuse there is or was a source of antimatter?
It was only recent that scientists realized antimatter is produced locally on earth by special storms:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/2055 ... understorm

Could it be that Betelgeuse's loss of mass and subsequent shrouding by nearby gas,
is a mere side effect of the star passing through a cloud of what we might call antimatter?

I think this is all very interesting stuff,


p.s. Pulsars can apparently throw off antimatter/positrons,
and they aren't always readily visible. Young pulsars are detectable by gamma signature and that's pretty recent stuff too.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ulsar.html


"black widow stars"

http://www.space.com/24891-black-widow- ... video.html

Spinning 390 times a second, the "black widow" pulsar PSR J1311−3430 periodically swings its radio (green) and gamma-ray (magenta) beams past Earth in this artist's concept. The pulsar heats the facing side of its stellar partner to temperatures twice as hot as the sun's surface and slowly evaporates it.
Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
View full size image

[Rob Halford]

Have you read of ''planet x'' at all?

[Naga_Fireball]

Have you read of ''planet x'' at all?

I just read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune

It was mindblowing,
and what I took away from it was that NASA is using the supposed 1992 probe data of Neptune to "refute" Planet X theory;
they threw two curveballs in one pitch, being a.) "Pluto doesnt have enough mass to be planet X" and b.) "oh we were wrong all along about Neptune's mass"...

It seems like they stumbled over the one half truth about Pluto etc. to splat against the flat lie regarding Neptune's mass.

They've put the proverbial Batcloak around the matter.
Time may tell if they have done so.

The corporations will use the truth as impetus to vitalize space travel.
It will work out in its own weird way.

p.s. some smart looking dudes from the Wiki

Percival Lowell, originator of the Planet X hypothesis

Jacques Babinet, an early proponent of a trans-Neptunian planet

p.p.s.

some more of the story:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_% ... al_star%29

Nemesis is a hypothetical red dwarf[1] or brown dwarf,[2] originally postulated in 1984 to be orbiting the Sun at a distance of about 95,000 AU (1.5 light-years),[2] somewhat beyond the Oort cloud, to explain a perceived cycle of mass extinctions in the geological record, which seem to occur more often at intervals of 26 million years.[2][3] As of 2012, over 1800 brown dwarfs have been identified and none of them are inside the Solar System.[4] There are actually fewer brown dwarfs in our cosmic neighborhood than previously thought. Rather than one star for every brown dwarf, there may be as many as six stars for every brown dwarf.[5] The majority of solar-type stars are single.[6]

More recent theories suggest that other forces, like close passage of other stars, or the angular effect of the galactic gravity plane working against the outer solar orbital plane, may be the cause of orbital perturbations of some outer Solar System objects.[7] In 2011, Coryn Bailer-Jones analysed craters on the surface of the Earth and reached the conclusion that the earlier findings of simple periodic patterns (implying periodic comet showers dislodged by a hypothetical Nemesis star) to be statistical artifacts, and found that the crater record shows no evidence for Nemesis.[8] However, in 2010, A.L. Melott and R.K. Bambach found evidence in the fossil record confirming the extinction event periodicity originally claimed by Raup & Sepkoski in 1984, but at a higher confidence level and over a time period nearly twice as long.[9] The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) failed to discover Nemesis in the 1980s. The 2MASS astronomical survey, which ran from 1997 to 2001, failed to detect an additional star or brown dwarf in the Solar System.[10]

Using newer and more powerful infrared telescope technology, able to detect brown dwarfs as cool as 150 kelvins out to a distance of 10 light-years from the Sun,[11] results from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE survey) have not detected Nemesis.[12][13] In 2011, David Morrison, a senior scientist at NASA known for his work in risk assessment of near Earth objects, has written that there is no confidence in the existence of an object like Nemesis, since it should have been detected in infrared sky surveys.[12][14][15][16]

Anything involving mass extinctions, telling the truth could cause panic down here and NASA wouldn't do that, right?




also:

http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/images/ ... iverse.htm

Observing the Invisible

Understanding something you cannot see is difficult--but not impossible. Not surprisingly, astronomers currently study dark matter by its effects on the bright matter that we do observe. For instance, when we watch a nearby star wobbling predictably, we infer from calculations that a "dark planet" orbits around it. Applying similar principles to spiral galaxies, we infer dark matter's presence because it accounts for the otherwise inexplicable motions of stars within those galaxies.

When we observe the orbits of stars and clouds of gas as they circle the centers of spiral galaxies, we find that they move too quickly. These unexpectedly high velocities signal the gravitational tug exerted by something more than that galaxy's visible matter. From detailed velocity measurements, we conclude that large amounts of invisible matter exert the gravitational force that is holding these stars and gas clouds in high-speed orbits. We deduce that dark matter is spread out around the galaxy, reaching beyond the visible galactic edge and bulging above and below the otherwise flattened, luminous galactic disk. As a rough approximation, try to envision a typical spiral galaxy, such as our Milky Way, as a relatively flat, glowing disk embedded in a spherical halo of invisible material--almost like an extremely diffuse cloud.

Thank you Rob, this one really spun the hamster wheel

[ambady]

its a hot topic spiritwind.but we have to prepare for survive that high energy plasma ejected from sun.may be we can transform in to another personality i belive in the case of paranormal power.why not if we get thease energy from our sun we get a lot of power.everyone is trying to practice yoga with looking sun,why cause sun has the power to transform our earth entirely.