The Covid Mystery – Is Truth Being Suppressed?
By Jonwoodhouse on August 22, 2021
https://mauihawaiitheworld.wordpress.co ... #more-6902
In the midst of the endless Covid pandemic, a new study was just released revealing the popular blue masks that many people wear are basically useless. Which calls into question why do we have mask mandates around the world without any requirement about their effectiveness? Since the outbreak we have been inundated with Covid information that has often turned out be questionable or even false. Remember when we were told to wear masks at the beach? And we were told that the vaccines are completely safe, as evidence mounts that serious side-effects are not uncommon. All this confusion led me to take a dive into the murky Covid world and pose some relevant questions.
Why were people who were vaccinated not warned they could still get Covid?
In a study focused on an outbreak in the Cape Cod town of Provincetown, researchers said that 346 cases – or 74% – occurred in fully vaccinated people. 89%, had the Delta variant. The study found that 79% of vaccinated patients with breakthrough infection were symptomatic. There were five COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized, four of whom were fully vaccinated.
President Biden. July 2021 – “You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the IC unit, and you’re not going to die.”
Dr Fauci, December 2020 – “We know for sure it’s very, very good, 94%, 95% in protecting you against clinically recognizable disease.”
Why are we just finding out that vaccinated adults infected with the Delta variant “can match virus levels of unvaccinated?”
“We don’t yet know how much transmission can happen from people who get Covid-19 after being vaccinated. They may have high levels of virus for shorter periods of time,” said Sarah Walker, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Oxford.
Why has the effectiveness of ivermectin for Covid been suppressed?
Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba, conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial from May 15, 2020, through the end of January 2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.
In Schwartz’s study, some 89 eligible volunteers over the age of 18 who were diagnosed with coronavirus and staying in state-run COVID-19 hotels were divided into two groups: 50% received ivermectin, and 50% received a placebo, according to their weight. They were given the pills for three days in a row, an hour before a meal.
Nearly 72% of volunteers treated with ivermectin tested negative for the virus by day six. In contrast, only 50% of those who received the placebo tested negative.
The study found that only 13% of ivermectin patients were infectious after six days, compared with 50% of the placebo group – almost four times as many.
“Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” Schwartz said. “It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact.”
Ivermectin costs up to $10 a day in Israel, Schwartz said. During Schwartz’s study, there was no significant side effects among ivermectin users. But neither the FDA nor the World Health Organization have been willing to approve it for use in the fight against the virus.
Why? “This drug will not bring any big economic profits,” and so Big Pharma doesn’t want to deal with it, he said.
In a new meta analysis of 63 studies using the most serious outcome reported shows 72% [55‑82%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis. Statistically significant improvements were seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.
The FDA has warned Americans to not take Ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.
In a public statement about ivermectin, Merck Co. which developed the drug, reported: “our analysis has identified no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19.” Japan requested Merck conduct clinical trials early in the pandemic and they declined.
Why has Merck been given $1.2 billion to develop an expensive drug with a similar mechanism as ivermectin?
On June 9, Merck announced it will receive approximately $1.2 billion to supply 1.7 million courses of molnupiravir to the United States government. Molnupiravir is a new drug Merck is currently evaluating in a Phase 3 clinical trials to treat COVID. The estimated cost of the drug per treatment is $700!It has been reportedmolnupiravir contains some of the same molecular qualities as ivermectin.
Dr. Pierre Kory, the president ofFrontline Covid19 Critical Care Alliance and one of the most prominent advocates of ivermectin, believes that the new drug acts in a similar way.
Dr. Syed Mobeen, reported “it seems that molnupiravir is a copy of one of Ivermectin’s mechanisms. This mechanism is to disrupt the SARS-COV-2 virus’ RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) enzyme. Copying this mechanism will give Merck a way to earn from an existing cheap drug’s action by relabeling it.”
Why are so many people asymptomatic?
Research suggests asymptomatic people simply might be genetically luckier. Some people have variations of the ACE2 genes that make them more susceptible to getting infected by COVID-19’s spike protein, or more prone to inflammation. An analysis by a group of US medical researchers on more than 350 studies has found just over 35% of all COVID-19 infections are asymptomatic.
Which makes you wonder why on the island of Mauritius – “As many as 99 percent of cases are asymptomatic,” said Zouberr Joomaye, spokesman for the National Communication Committee. 40 percent of Mauritians have received two vaccine doses, and 50 percent one shot.
According to India’s health ministry, nearly 80 percent of Covid-19 patients have shown little or no symptoms of the infection.
Why can Sweden be mask free?
No-lockdown, mask-free Sweden is approaching zero Covid deaths per day. At the beginning of July it dropped its last remaining mask mandate for public transport.
Why has Denmark been able to drop their mask mandate?
Masks will no longer be required on Danish public transport, the government said. “We can say goodbye to masks on buses, trains and the metro.” Denmark will lift all restrictions by October 1. It also plans to phase out its “corona pass” required for some activities by the same date. Up to 25,000 people will be allowed at public events.
What made Iceland safe?
All Covid-19 restrictions are lifted. “We are restoring the society we are used to living in and which we have longed for,” said Minister of Health Svandís Svavarsdóttir. Visitors and residents of Iceland are no longer required to wear face masks, social distance, or limit the number of attendees at gatherings. About 87% of Icelanders have received at least one shot of the COVID-19 vaccine, while about 60% are already fully vaccinated.
Why are children being forced to wear masks?
A study published in JAMA Pediatrics on June 30 – Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children – warned children are breathing in dangerous levels of carbon dioxide. “The dead-space volume of the masks, collects exhaled carbon dioxide quickly after a short time. This carbon dioxide mixes with fresh air and elevates the carbon dioxide content of inhaled air under the mask, and this was more pronounced in this study for younger children.”
German study on children and masks by the University of Witten – data on 25,930 children – 68% reported impairments caused by wearing a mask including irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school/kindergarten (44%), malaise (42%) impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%).
Dr. Fauci: “Unvaccinated children of a certain age, greater than two years old, should be wearing masks, no doubt about that.”
Why is the vaccine being pushed on teenagers with antibodies?
Almost 80 per cent of 16 to 24 year olds already have Covid-fighting antibodies, official figures suggested today. England’s largest surveillance study estimated the high levels after testing blood samples of more than 1,000 youngsters in the week ending July 18. Almost 60 per cent of 16-17 year olds had signs of immunity, despite vaccines not being routinely offered to the youngest age group. Experts have questioned the ‘pointless’ plans, saying youngsters — who face a tiny risk of dying — are gradually gaining immunity through natural exposure.
Why are masks being mandated without any specificity to the type that works?
Those popular blue masks?A study fromCanada’s University of Waterloo found that the blue, cloth surgical masks that have become popular during the pandemic were only 10% effective in preventing people from being infected as it doe not cover the face properly, unlike N95 masks. “There is a very serious difference in the effectiveness of different masks when it comes to controlling aerosols.”
Dr Colin Axon, who has advised the UK government on minimizing the risk of cross-infection in supermarkets told the Telegraph that cloth face coverings are just “comfort blankets” that do little to reduce the spread of Covid particles.
“Masks can catch droplets and sputum from a cough but what is important is that SARS CoV-2 is predominantly distributed by tiny aerosols. A Covid viral particle is around 100 nanometres, material gaps in blue surgical masks are up to 1,000 times that size, cloth mask gaps can be 5,000 times the size. Not everyone carrying Covid is coughing, but they are still breathing, those aerosols escape masks and will render the mask ineffective.”
“The public were demanding something must be done, they got masks, it is just a comfort blanket,” Dr Axon noted. “But now it is entrenched, and we are entrenching bad behavior. All around the world you can look at mask mandates and superimpose on infection rates, you cannot see that mask mandates made any effect whatsoever.”
Why has expensive Remdesivir been promoted for Covid relief when it shows no benefit in survival and led to longer hospitalizations, according to the latest research?
A study of a 5,800 VA patients hospitalizedwith Covid found nosurvival benefit. Remdesivir is the only antiviral fully approved for COVID–19 treatment by the FDA. The researchers suggest that the prescribed regimen (5 or 10 days) may have led to longer hospitalizations as patients finished the treatment course. The World Health Organization does not recommend it. The cost of Remdesivir – $3120 per patient for a typical treatment course for those with private insurance. Side effects include nausea, constipation, pain, bleeding, and bruising of the skin.
Why did Dr. Fauci try to suppress information that Wuhan was the source of the manipulated Covid virus?
A teleconference was held on February 1, 2020 organized by a large medical research charity in London. Participants included Fauci. The conference was held to discuss the unanimous view of a group of virologists that the SARS2 virus had been manipulated in a lab. Fauci had received a memo from Kristian G. Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research institute that the virus seemed to be man-made. Almost all references to what was discussed at the teleconference have been redacted from Fauci’s emails. Then began the campaign to squelch all discussion of the possibility that the virus had escaped from a lab by deriding it as a conspiracy theory.
It is “beyond reasonable doubt” that SARS-CoV-2 was created through “laboratory manipulation”, according to a new study by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr Birger Sørensen in scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery. The paper claims that the virus was made in a Wuhan lab by Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks by retro-engineering versions of the virus to make it look like it evolved naturally from bats.
Why is the WHO in bed with China?
An investigation by The Sunday Times in the UK, revealed efforts by Beijing to control the WHO’s decision making, sabotage investigations and even install officials. The report claims the health body’s independence had been eroded prior to the global spread of the deadly virus in early 2020. The Times claims the WHO failed to publicly challenge Chinese misinformation, delayed declaring an international emergency, and discouraged governments from placing travel bans on China to protect its economy. It has also been suggested officials agreed a ‘backroom deal’ with the Chinese to water down the inquiry into the origins of Covid-19. WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, is a long-time friend of China.
Why are women not being warned the vaccine impacts their menstrual cycles?
An article in The Spectatorwarned thatBritish women have made 30,304 reports of changes to their periods after having received a Covid vaccine. In the US, one research survey tracking menstrual changes brought on by the Covid jabs received 140,000 responses. These changes are still left out of the official possible side effects warning.
According to the FDA as well as Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, women’s consistent reports of period irregularities following the vaccine doesn’t represent evidence that those irregularities exist!
Researchers Kate Clancy of the University of Illinois and Katharine Lee of Washington University told NPR they received accounts from trans men on gender-affirming therapy hormones and women in menopause who experienced period-like bleeding after the vaccine, despite not having had a period in a long time—sometimes years.
Why is there so much fear?
So far the percentage of people in the world’s population who have been tested and got Covid is roughly 2.4%. The chance of dying from Covid is around 0.05%.
Are they hiding the scope of vaccine injuries?
Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson, exposed: “Covid vaccine maker Moderna received 300,000 reports of side effects after vaccinations over a three-month period following the launch of its shot, according to an internal report from IQVIA, a company that helps Moderna manage the reports. That figure is far higher than the number of side effect reports about Moderna’s vaccine publicly available in the federal system that tracks such adverse events.”
Why is the President mandating vaccination of all military personnel?
A Journal of the American Medical Association study found 23 U.S. service members experienced post-vaccination moderate to severe myocarditis who were otherwise healthy and non-symptomatic. More than half of Israel’s seriously ill patients who are currently hospitalized were fully vaccinated.
Why has the CDC stopped tracking breakthrough infections that resulted in asymptomatic, mild, or moderate cases?
Since May 1, the CDC has only reported and investigated coronavirus infections among vaccinated people that resulted in hospitalization or death.
Why did the Wuhan Institute of Virology take its data base offline in September 2019?
On September 12, the main database of samples and viral sequences of the Wuhan Institute of Virology went offline. The database contained more than 22,000 entries consisting of sample and pathogen data collected from bats and mice. It contained key information about each sample, including what type of animal it was collected from, where it was collected, whether the virus was successfully isolated, the type of virus collected, and its similarity to other known viruses.
Why has there been no official investigation of athletes reporting Covid-like symptoms after visiting Wuhan in October 2019?
U.S. lawmakers are demanding an investigation into the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, China, in October 2019, where athletes complained of COVID-like symptoms. One athlete from Luxembourg reported “nearly empty” streets in Wuhan during the games, recalling, “It was a ghost town.” Multiple athletes have described contracting similar COVID-like symptoms during the games.
Why do some scientists promote Covid fear with computer simulations that don’t replicate the real world?
In the latest “scientific” Covid fear-mongering two researchers in Cyprus claim Covid “might” spread further on the back of pollen from trees, potentially increasing the risk of infection in crowded areas. How did they arrive at this? They used a computer simulation!
Are PCR tests dodgy?
In a report in the Journal of Infection, after analyzing the test results from a large German laboratory in Münster that amounted to 80% of all Covid PCR tests in the Münster region during March to November 2020, scientists found that “more than half of individuals with positive PCR test results are unlikely to have been infectious”. The scientists concluded: “RT-PCR test positivity should not be taken as an accurate measure of infectious SARS-CoV-2 incidence.”
Why is the CDC stoking fear?
The CDC published a “study” in June purporting to show an increase in hospitalizations among 12- to 17-year-olds – leading to fear headlines – “reinforcing importance of vaccinating kids” claimed CNN. In reality, childhood hospitalizations plummeted and only rose slightly from a near-zero baseline earlier this year along with other groups. The CDC skewed the data cutting off on a peak day before hospitalizations plummeted. And a report found 46% of reputed hospitalizations were “not clearly COVID-19 related.”
Why were State Department officials told not to investigate Wuhan’s gain-of-function research?
In one State Department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s gain-of-function research, because it would bring unwelcome attention to U.S. government funding of it.
Why did Fauci lie about the U.S. funding Wuhan’s gain-of-function research?
“The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute.” Dr Fauci to Rand Paul.
Newsweek magazine reported Fauci lied about funding dangerous gain of function research at Wuhan. “Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain–of–function researchon bat coronaviruses.”
In 2019, the National Institutes of Health, with the backing of Fauci-led National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, committed $3.7 million over six years for research on bat coronaviruses in China. The research also included gain of function work, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans.
Richard Ebright, an infectious disease expert at Rutgers University, told Newsweek, “The project description refers to experiments that would enhance the ability of bat coronavirus to infect human cells and laboratory animals using techniques of genetic engineering. In the wake of the pandemic, that is a noteworthy detail.”
Why has Fauci promoted dangerous gain of function bat research?
An investigation by The Weekend Australian found that Dr. Fauci did not warn Trump administration officials before a ban was removed on gain-of-function research back in 2017 and also claimed the benefits of the controversial research outweighed the risk of pandemic. The NIH gave grant money to EcoHealth alliance, which gave $600,000 over six years to the Wuhan lab “to conduct genetic analyses of bat coronaviruses collected in Yunnan province.
Why has Facebook suppressed comments about vaccine safety?
Facebook has crushed vaccine hesitancy with a new algorithm to demote comments. Newly leaked “Vaccine Hesitancy Comment Demotion” document includes: “get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you, everyone should get it. If you don’t, you will be singled out as an enemy of society.”
Why did the British government promote fear as a Covid control mechanism?
The Telegraph reported on May 14, 2021 – Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behavior during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was “totalitarian.” “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism,” said psychologist Gavin Morgan. One government scientist admitted “The way we have used fear is dystopian. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.” Member of Parliament Steve Baker commented: “If we’re being really honest, do I fear that Government policy today is playing into the roots of totalitarianism? Yes, of course it is.”
“They want to keep Project Fear going because they are enjoying the control they have.” UK politician Sir Iain Duncan-Smith.
Did China contemplate biological war with the West six years ago?
China was preparing for war with biological weapons – including coronavirus – 6 years ago, in dossier by People’s Liberation Army scientists and health officials, obtained by the US officials. “Attacks should be released at night, or at dawn, dusk, or under cloudy weather, with ‘a stable wind direction…so that the aerosol can float into the target area.”
David Asher, an expert on biological, chemical and nuclear proliferation, who led State Department inquiries into the origins of Covid-19, said: “The Chinese have made it clear they see biotechnology as a big part of the future of hybrid warfare. The big question is whether their work in these fields is offensive or defensive.”
Why did Bill Gates renege on his “royalty free” vaccine?
The Guardian April 14 – Oxford University initially said any vaccine it developed would be open to qualified manufacturers to produce without paying royalties, and priced either at cost or at a small profit. This would allow countries on the receiving end of decades and centuries of colonialism, and its modern form perpetrated primarily by corporations, to produce their own vaccines. Unfortunately, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which practices its own form of colonialism by manipulating the healthcare systems of entire nations, intervened, along with others, and pushed Oxford to partner with a pharmaceutical company.
Why is mask toxicity not being thoroughly investigated?
German scientists have found that wearing certain types of face masks for long periods of time could result in potentially hazardous chemicals and harmful microplastics being inhaled into lungs. “The toxicity of some of the chemicals found and the postulated risks of the rest of the present particles and molecules, raises the question of whether DPFs (disposable plastic facemasks) are safe to be used on a daily basis and what consequences are to be expected after their disposal into the environment.” The researchers found lead, cadmium, antimony and various plastic and organic substances. “A full investigation is necessary to determine the quantities and potential impacts of these particles leaching into the environment, and the levels being inhaled by users during normal breathing. This is a significant concern, especially for health care professionals, key workers, and children who are mandated to wear masks for large proportions of the working or school day (6–12 hours).”
Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson – “No one has found the bat population that was the source of SARS2, if indeed it ever infected bats. No intermediate host has presented itself, despite an intensive search by Chinese authorities that included the testing of 80,000 animals. There is no evidence of the virus making multiple independent jumps from its intermediate host to people, as both the SARS1 and MERS viruses did. There is no evidence from hospital surveillance records of the epidemic gathering strength in the population as the virus evolved. There is no explanation of why a natural epidemic should break out in Wuhan and nowhere else. There is no good explanation of how the virus acquired its furin cleavage site, which no other beta-coronavirus possesses, nor why the site is composed of human-preferred codons.”
Are lockdowns dangerous for kids?
New Scientist – “Extended lockdowns may have long-term effects on children’s immune systems, affecting allergic responses.”
Why does the American media focus on Covid doom?
About 87 percent of Covid coverage in national U.S. media last year was negative. The share was 51 percent in international media. News videos online did not portray coping strategies and healthy behaviors as much as they could have. Headlines are contributing to fear and uncertainty. 90% of school-reopening articles from the U.S. mainstream media were negative, versus only 56% for the English-language media in other countries. Stories of increasing COVID-19 cases outnumbered stories about decreasing cases by a factor of 5.5 — even during periods when new cases were declining. When cases were trending down nationwide, media outlets would emphasize records in individual states or the cumulative death toll. “Of course, the cumulative can only go up,” said Dartmouth College professor of economics Bruce Sacerdote. “It can’t go down.”
Why is building natural immunity not being stressed?
Researchers found that people who ate foods rich in flavonoids (blueberries, green tea) were less likely to get an upper respiratory tract infection, or common cold, than those who did not. Curcumin (turmeric) has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Ginger has anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties.
One study found that 20 minutes of moderate exercise stimulated the immune system, which, in turn, produced an anti-inflammatory cellular response.
Researchers discovered that sunlight energizes infection-fighting T cells that play a key part in immunity. Specifically, the blue light that is found in the sun’s rays made T cells move faster, which may help them get to an infection site and respond more quickly.
Richard Weller, MD, a sunlight researcher at the University of Edinburgh looked at Covid-19 data in the US, and said there seems to be a correlation between states that get a lot of sun and lower rates of death. “I think there are probably several pathways by which sunlight and sun exposure may exert beneficial effects,” he says.
Sunlight exposure causes the skin to release nitric oxide. This may reduce the ability of SARS Coronavirus2 to replicate, as has been found in some lab studies. The effect appears independent of a vitamin D pathway. He says sunlight exposure is one way of potentially reducing the risk of death.
Why were we told the risk of Covid outside was just as dangerous as inside?
Remember when we were told to wear masks at the beach. An Irish Covid study – Only one coronavirus infection in every thousand occurs outside, suggesting there is minimal risk to people meeting outdoors, where particles of the virus rapidly disperse.
UK epidemiologist, NO Covid outbreak anywhere in the world has been traced back to a beach. Professor Mark Woolhouse at the University of Edinburgh, announced “There were no outbreaks linked to crowded beaches.”
Dr Simon Clarke, Associate Professor in Cellular Microbiology, University of Reading: “If wearing masks outdoors was thought to reduce coronavirus transmission, we would probably already have been told to do so. They might have an effect in very crowded outdoor environments.”
Prof Paul Hunter, Professor in Medicine, The Norwich School of Medicine, University of East Anglia: “General mask wearing out of doors is not appropriate. Masks do have value, but they are no replacement for proper social distancing and in the vast majority of outdoor settings social distancing will should be much easier. I would argue strongly against wearing masks outdoors unless you have to be in a crowd.”
The risk of becoming infected with Covid while socializing outdoors is ‘much lower’ than doing the same indoors, say Dr Shaun Fitzgerald of Cambridge University. Even the slightest breeze will radically cut the chance of receiving an infectious dose from a nearby diner, as the air movement will prevent build-up of Sars-Cov-2 particles. “Fresh air effectively carries the virus away. Evidence shows people are able to fend off infection if they are exposed to a low dose.”
Is cheap the cheap anti-depressant Fluvoxamine a remedy?
The use of Fluvoxamine has the potential to cut hospital admissions by 30 per cent when used on those infected with the coronavirus say researchers at Canada’s McMaster University. The treatment typically costs $10. The oral treatment of Fluvoxamine is known to reduce inflammation of the brain.
Why is the Center for Countering Digital Hate seeking to censor anyone questioning the safety of vaccines?
Like George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth in his book “1984,” we have the London based so called Center for Countering Digital Hate seeking to censor anyone questioning the safety of vaccines or the official Covid narrative.
Did Bill Gates dodgy pandemic exercise in 2019 predict dystopian control?
Bill Gates Event 201 pandemic exercise in Oct. 2019 – George Gao, director Chinese Center for Disease Control, worried about how to suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is a man made.” Rear Admiral Stephen Redd, Public Health Service, governments should mine social media data to identify people with negative beliefs, “there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to misinformation.” Kevin McAleese, communications officer, “The task of identifying every bad actor is immense. This is a huge problem that’s going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice.”
Why did China not warn the world earlier?
Regarding China’s role in spreading Covid-19 – “The pandemic could have been avoided if China was transparent,” reported Taiwanese health official Dr Yee Chun-Lo in a British doc on the Covid pandemic. The Chinese government knew at the beginning of January 2020 that Covid was spread from human to human. Doctors were told not to tell the truth, and the doc revealed the government knew New Year celebrations would spread the virus, and it allowed Chinese citizens to travel domestically and internationally. That’s criminal.
Why is President Biden promoting booster shots when we don’t know if they are safe?
Some scientists view the announcement as rash and based on weak science, and more information is needed on potential side effects or adverse effects from a booster shot. The FDA has not authorized boosters for all adults. “It would be nice to understand what side effects people have after their third dose,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist and associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “We need to know the side effect profile of a third dose, especially in younger people,” said Dr. Jeremy Faust at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
Why aren’t cheaper Covid tests available?
A team of scientists in India has developed an inexpensive paper-based test for coronavirus that could give fast results. Scientists estimate that the kit – called Feluda – would return results in under an hour and cost about $6.75. “This is a simple, precise, reliable, scalable and frugal test,” Professor K Vijay Raghavan, principal scientific adviser to the Indian government, told the BBC.
“The new test has the reliability of the PCR test, is quicker and can be done in smaller laboratories which don’t have sophisticated machines,” Dr Anurag Agarwal, director of IGIB, told the BBC.
The BinaxNOW COVID19 Antigen Self Test costs $20 at Walmart.
A 2020 Reuters report – “How U.S. made Covid-19 tests a profitable disaster” – “Shares in companies like Quest Diagnostics and Laboratory Corporation of America are soaring. Quest Diagnostics will earn $1 billion this year. For Covid-19, the basic price set by government-backed insurer Medicare is $100.
Why are people dying right after getting vaccinated?
In Waterford, Ireland, a local hero, Roy Butler, captain of the town’s football team, died on August 17 of a massive brain bleed three days after getting the J&J vaccine. He was 23. News reports said he “died after a short illness.” A member of his family posted the vaccine info and her FB post was removed.
In a July 21, 2021, the CDC said it had received 12,313 reports of people who had died after receiving a COVID vaccine between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 19, 2021.
The death of a Michigan teenager, just days after he received his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine is now under investigation. Health officials say a 13-year-old from Saginaw County died in his sleep in mid-June, three days after his second dose, according to the Detroit Free Press. Jacob was healthy, said his aunt, and had no known underlying medical conditions. He complained of common post-vaccine symptoms, she said, in the two days between his immunization and death, which included fatigue and fever. A preliminary autopsy findings suggest Jacob’s heart was enlarged.
A CDC advisory committee acknowledged “a likely association” between the Pfizer and Moderna coronavirus vaccines and a risk of heart problems in adolescents and young adults.
More than 160 people have died and nearly 650 have been hospitalized in Illinois due to COVID-19 in “breakthrough” cases after they were fully vaccinated, according to state health officials.
Why would a doctor would not administer an mRNA vaccine to a healthy animal, never mind a healthy human being?
Dr. Marcus De Brun – Healthy People Do Not Require Genetic Vaccination:
Vaccines produced by four companies (Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson) are ‘genetic vaccines’ in that they are composed of synthetic DNA or RNA that is contained within a membrane or shell. In construction and appearance the vaccine is very similar to the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for the coronavirus disease known as Covid-19. The vaccine gains entry to human cells by a process that is almost identical to the manner by which a virus generally gains access to host cells.
So what is different about genetic-vaccines? A genetic vaccine looks like, and functions, in almost exactly the same manner as the coronavirus itself. When DNA vaccines (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca) enter the nucleus of our cells, and are treated as our own DNA, they come with a risk of damaging our own DNA, causing mutations. It doesn’t normally happen that RNA interferes with DNA, but RNA can travel backwards into the nucleus and interfere with or incorporate into DNA.
Why are some governments pushing Covid vaccination for children?
A warning letter from 40 British doctors and scientists – “It is irresponsible, unethical and indeed, unnecessary, to include children under 18 years in the national COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Healthy children are at almost no risk from COVID-19, with risk of death as low as 1 in 2.5 million. No previously healthy child under the age of 15 died during the pandemic in the UK and admissions to hospital or intensive care are exceedingly rare10 with most children having no or very mild symptoms.
Although Long-Covid has been cited as a reason for vaccinating children, there is little hard data. It appears less common and much shorter lived than in adults and none of the vaccine trials have studied this outcome.
The inflammatory condition, PIMS, was listed as a potential adverse effect in the Oxford AstraZeneca children’s trial. Naturally acquired immunity will give broader and better lasting immunity than vaccination. Indeed, many children will already be immune. Individual children at very high risk can already receive vaccination on compassionate grounds. Children do not transmit SARS-CoV-2 as readily as adults, moreover adults living or working with young children are at lower risk of severe COVID-19.
The mRNA is effectively a pro-drug and it is not known how much spike protein any individual will produce. Potential late-onset effects can take months or years to become apparent. The limited children’s trials undertaken to date are totally underpowered to rule out uncommon but severe side effects. A recently published paper raised the possibility that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could trigger prion-based, neurodegenerative disease.
Why is it better to get Covid rather than the vaccine?
You get a broader immune response after being infected with the virus than vaccination. Whether you’ve had Moderna or Pfizer or Oxford-AstraZeneca, your body is learning to spot just one thing – the spike protein.
“If you had a real humdinger of an infection, you may have better immunity to any new variants that pop up as you have immunity to more than just spike,” said Prof Riley, an immunologist from the University of Edinburgh. Each time you’re exposed, the immune system gets a little bit stronger, and this continues until old age, when the immune system starts to fail and the infections become a problem again.
“It could be a lot cheaper and simpler to let that happen than spend the whole time immunizing people,” said Prof Adam Finn.
Whys is the scope of vaccine blood clots being hidden?
Canadian doctor Charles Hoffe found evidence of microscopic blood clots in 62 percent of his patients that had received the Moderna vaccine. He predicted dire long term health impacts from these clots in capillaries. “The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer blood test.
The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged. This has never before been seen. This is not a rare disease. This is an absolutely new phenomenon.”
Hoffe was fired from his hospital job after issuing this warning. He was subsequently forbidden by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia to say anything negative about the vaccine.
Why are we seeing draconian, dictatorial measures in nations like Australia?
Chinese Communist Party head, Lu Xue reported “Quite ironically, it turns out that Canberra plans to send its military personnel to help enforce social lockdown.”
As Prof. Ramesh Thakur writes: Australia has morphed from being the envy of the world last year for its incredible pandemic management to international incredulity at the brutality of its authoritarian measures to “crush and kill the virus.” The U.K. Telegraph said in an editorial, “How has it come to the point that Australia needs to call up the military to eradicate a virus that is now endemic in the world?”
Australia didn’t get the memo. Back in 2019 a Johns Hopkins Center for Heath Security report noted, “Quarantine measures will be least effective for pathogens that are highly transmissible.”
Why do some folks suggests the Covid virus has not been isolated?
“Canada has no record of ‘SARS-COV-2’ isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever” says Christine Massey. Which led Jon Rappaport to conclude “the virus has not been proven to exist.” He adds, “SAYING the virus has been isolated is not the same thing as proving it’s been isolated. Researchers routinely twist the meaning of the word “isolated” to mean its very opposite.” Plus, “SAYING the sequencing (of the genetic structure of the virus) has been achieved is not the same thing as proving it.”
Report in Emerging Infectious Diseases says it has been isolated – Clinical specimens from a case-patient who had acquired COVID-19 during travel to China and who was identified in Washington, USA, were collected on January 20, 2020. We isolated virus from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens from this patient and characterized the viral sequence, replication properties, and cell culture tropism. We found that the virus replicates to high titer in Vero-CCL81 cells and Vero E6 cells in the absence of trypsin. We also deposited the virus into 2 virus repositories, making it broadly available to the public health and research communities.
Dr. Wu Zunyou, the chief epidemiologist of China’s CDC stated in January 2021 to NBC that no virus was isolated at the start of the epidemic. NBC’s Janet Frayer: “Chinese officials took samples over a year ago and why has the data not been shared?” Dr. Wu Zunyou: “They didn’t isolate the virus. That’s the issue.” Frayer: “What about live animal samples?” Dr. Wu Zunyou: “That doesn’t tell you anything.”
But here’s Dr. Wu in December 2020 at Peking University, “It only took a week to isolate the virus after we identified the epidemic. This was the shortest time on record for scientists to recognize a new infectious disease. It only took a few days from the isolation of pathogens to the creation of diagnostic reagents for clinical diagnosis.”
“Virus isolation, genome sequencing, average incubation period, and main modes of transmission, laid a scientific foundation for our country to formulate the prevention and control strategies of Covid-19. On January 12th, China shared the genome sequence of the virus with the world. Many people don’t understand what it means to share the genome sequence. In fact, as long as you know the genome sequence, you can produce diagnostic reagents and develop vaccines.”
Why do some people think the vaccine is a bio-weapon?
“Some people are going to die from the vaccine directly,” says Dr Sherry Tenpenny. “But a large number of people are going to start getting horribly sick and get all kinds of autoimmune diseases.” An osteopathic physician, she suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein created by mRNA vaccines will cause delayed but deadly immune reactions. “The problem is that the antibodies that (mRNA COVID-19 vaccines) generate are going to be deadly. It’s going to take somewhere between four months and maybe fourteen months before we see the whole ravage of what’s going to happen.”
There is concern that lung damage could possibly be caused by antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). After vaccination, some antibodies created to fight the coronaviruses bind only weakly to the virus, so instead of destroying the viral particles, these antibodies actually end up providing further access for a virus to infect cells, and serve to make the infection more severe.
nature microbiology Sept. 2020: Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement. However, clinical data has not yet fully established a role for ADE in human COVID-19 pathology.
Nobel Laureate Prof. Luc Montagnier suggests epidemiologists know but are “silent” about Antibody-Dependent Enhancement, and that “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.”
Montagnier also warned that “neurodegenerative illness” is a potential side effect of the coronavirus vaccine in “five to ten years.” He said there “are sequences that resemble the prion sequences in the RNA of the coronavirus” and could therefore “disorder the natural proteins in the brain, modifying them to make prions.”
“We’re in unknown territory and proclaim mandatory vaccines for everyone. It’s insanity.” Referencing the epigenetic effects of glyphosate impacting future generations he said: “This Messenger RNA that’s being injected today in vaccines, may have effects on future generations that are undetected if we aren’t searching for them.”
"Silence is golden when you can't think of a good answer."
1 post • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 4:24 pm
- Location: Inland NW, U.S.
- Has thanked: 2357 times
- Been thanked: 2826 times